AGC rejects representation by Azeez’s family in RM16 mil forfeiture suit

8 Feb 2022 • 2:00 PM MYT
The Vibes
The Vibes

Featuring breaking news & latest stories from every side.

image is not available
AGC rejects representation by Azeez’s family in RM16 mil forfeiture suit

KUALA LUMPUR – The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) has rejected a representation submitted by family members of former Tabung Haji chairman Datuk Seri Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahim against the government’s application to forfeit their assets, involving cash and property worth RM16 million allegedly obtained through unlawful activities.

Deputy public prosecutor Nik Haslinie Hashim said a letter on the rejection of the representation was sent to the lawyer representing the family on February 4.

“Today is set for case management on the status of the representation by the respondents. The representation, filed on November 16, has been rejected by the AGC,” he said during the proceedings before high court judge Datuk Muhammad Jamil Hussin.

Lawyer Datuk Prem Ramachandran, representing Azeez’s family, confirmed having received the letter.

Following which, the court ordered the parties involved to file their written submissions by mid-May and set June 21 for hearing of the forfeiture suit.

In the suit filed in September 2019, the government is applying to forfeit almost RM16 million from the accounts belonging to Azeez’s wife Datin Seri Khadijah Mohd Noor, their four children – Mohamed Khairul Anwar, Mohamed Khairul Azman, Khaleeda Azwa, Khaleeda Azeera – and also a shop lot in Bandar Sunway owned by their company, Azeera Management Consultants (M) Sdn Bhd.

On December 18, the court dismissed the family’s application to stay the forfeiture proceedings pending the disposal of the Baling MP’s ongoing corruption case at the sessions court.

Azeez is currently on trial for three counts of accepting bribes amounting to RM5.2 million in connection with road projects in Perak and Kedah and 10 counts of money laundering involving a total of RM13.9 million which he allegedly received from Menuju Asas Sdn Bhd.

However, the trial has been postponed pending his appeal at the Court of Appeal to have the case against him struck out. – Bernama, February 8, 2022