A recent speech by preacher Zakir Naik in Perlis has sparked debate, with state religious authorities defending their decision to allow him to speak. The issue gained attention after concerns were raised about whether his public speaking engagements remained restricted under a previous ban.
A member of the Perlis Fatwa Committee, Prof Dr Rozaimi Ramle, clarified that Islamic affairs fall under the jurisdiction of state governments, with Perlis’ religious matters being overseen by the Malay ruler. He stressed that Zakir’s speech in Kangar had received formal approval from the Perlis Mufti, Datuk Prof Dr Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin. Given this, Rozaimi urged all parties, especially non-Muslim lawmakers, to respect the authority of state religious institutions.
The controversy began when Jelutong MP RSN Rayer questioned whether Zakir was still subject to restrictions imposed in the past. He referenced a report stating that the preacher had recently conducted an open religious talk in Perlis, leading him to ask the police why the ban had not been enforced. The lawmaker called for clarification on whether the restriction remained in effect.
In response, Rozaimi reaffirmed that matters related to Islam in Malaysia are determined by individual states rather than federal authorities, particularly in regions outside the Federal Territories. He maintained that the decision to permit the preacher’s talk was within the Perlis religious authorities' rights and should not be subject to external interference.
This situation has reignited discussions on Zakir’s presence in Malaysia, given the controversies that have followed him over the years. He has been accused of making statements that some believe could inflame racial and religious sensitivities. While his supporters argue that his speeches are meant for a Muslim audience and should be protected under religious freedom, others believe his rhetoric has a broader societal impact that cannot be ignored.
The debate also underscores a larger issue—whether controversial religious figures should be allowed a platform in Malaysia. His presence remains a divisive topic, with critics arguing that his influence complicates efforts to maintain harmony in the country’s multiracial and multi-religious society.
Ultimately, the controversy highlights ongoing tensions regarding religious discourse and governance in Malaysia. The differing perspectives on Zakir’s right to speak reflect broader concerns about state authority, religious sensitivities, and the balance between freedom of speech and social unity.
Information Source: Focus Malaysia
Kamran is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!
The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact Newswav.
