Did Prabowo Decide Not to Declare a National Disaster Because Indonesia Is Not Ready to Face Reality?

20 Dec 2025 • 3:00 PM MYT
AM World
AM World

A writer capturing headlines & hidden places, turning moments into words.

image is not available
Kompas

More than a million voices in Indonesia and beyond have been crying out for help after weeks of catastrophic flooding and landslides in the northern part of Sumatra. Families lost homes and loved ones. Roads vanished under mud. Survivors wandered through rubble searching for clean water and food. Yet, as the death toll surged past 1,000 in late 2025, the Indonesian government under President Prabowo Subianto still has not declared the crisis a national disaster. This gap between suffering and official designation has ignited national debate and international attention. (Reuters)

The question now is simple and stark: Why has Prabowo not declared the Sumatra floods and landslides a national disaster yet?

Here is a deep look into the politics, law, and human impact behind that decision.

A Flood of Tragedy That Shook Indonesia

It all began in late November 2025 when Cyclone Senyar brought extreme rainfall to Aceh, North Sumatra, and West Sumatra. Rivers overflowed. Hillsides collapsed. Thousands of homes disappeared. (Reuters)

Within days, official figures revealed:

  • Over 1,000 people killed or missing. (Reuters)
  • Tens of thousands displaced and sheltering in evacuation centers. (Reuters)
  • Infrastructure destroyed. Roads, bridges, power and communication lines cut off. (KoranKota - bukan berita biasa)

Local governments immediately declared provincial-level emergencies. But the national disaster declaration, which would trigger nationwide emergency powers and funding, has not been made. (VOI)

That choice has sparked heated discussion both inside Indonesia and abroad.

What a National Disaster Declaration Really Means

Under Indonesian law, only the President can declare a national disaster status through a Presidential Decree (Keppres). This status is not symbolic. It unlocks:

  • Direct access to central government funds.
  • Nationwide deployment of disaster management resources.
  • Faster bureaucratic processes for aid, reconstruction, land use, and external support.

Experts stress that national status can change how help arrives and how fast. But the government insists it has acted nationally even without the label. (suara.com)

Official Reasons for Not Declaring National Disaster

Government spokespeople and political allies have given several explanations:

The situation is “under control” with existing systems

MPR Chair Ahmad Muzani argued that central and local governments are coordinating well, and that a national emergency declaration isn’t necessary now. (VOI)

National disaster status is reserved for historic, massive crises

The National Disaster Management Agency (BNPB) head explained that Indonesia has historically declared only two national disasters: the 2004 Aceh tsunami and the COVID-19 pandemic. Other severe events were not declared, even major earthquakes in Lombok and Palu. (KoranKota - bukan berita biasa)

In this view, the Sumatra floods, while tragic, do not fit that very high bar yet.

Government says it is already acting nationwide

Coordinating ministers such as Pratikno said the government has mobilized all ministries, the military, and logistics as if it were a national disaster response, even without the formal title. (suara.com)

The process requires careful assessment

Prabowo himself told reporters the situation is still being monitored before making a final decision on national disaster status, focusing first on delivering aid and assessing needs. (POLRI)

These explanations reflect a cautious approach from the administration. Yet they also reveal tension between law and perception.

Political and Practical Fallout from the Decision

Critics argue that refusing to declare a national disaster has consequences beyond semantics.

Pressure from Lawmakers and Civil Society

Members of the Indonesian Parliament (DPR) publicly urged Prabowo to declare a national emergency quickly. They said this would signal fairness, boost morale, and ensure accountability in disaster response. (IDN Times)

Human rights groups also warned that without national status, coordination between regions and central government may be weaker, slowing delivery of aid and reconstruction. (IDN Times)

Public Frustration on the Ground

Some residents and local leaders reported that help was slow or uneven, with remote communities left behind well after the disaster began. (Timenews - Menghibur dan Beri Solusi)

In one case, isolated villages faced days without clean water or fuel because access roads were cut and logistics stalled. (Reuters)

Unrest and social media criticism mounted, with citizens questioning whether the response matched the scale of destruction.

Concerns About Financial and Administrative Implications

Some analysts suggest that declaring a national disaster exposes the government’s responsibility to allocate major funds publicly and could invite legal scrutiny of long-term planning. Others argue it could open doors for foreign assistance, which the government is cautious about. (suara.com)

Whether finance or political image plays a role is a subject of debate. But the perception of reluctance is real.

Human Stories Amid Policy Debate

Behind these policy discussions are real people whose lives changed forever.

A mother in West Sumatra spoke on camera about losing her home and uncertainty about rebuilding. She said aid distribution was uneven and slow. International journalists captured scenes of displaced families huddled under makeshift tents. (Note: this narrative reflects field reports seen widely on social media and major news platforms, though not every specific quote is from a single published article.)

Healthcare workers described rising cases of waterborne diseases in shelters without clean water. Farmers in Aceh watched entire rice fields vanished under floodwater just before harvest season. These human costs add weight to calls for a more decisive national response.

Prabowo’s Response Beyond the Label

While resisting the national disaster label, Prabowo has taken several concrete actions:

  • Ordered budget allocation for temporary and permanent housing for affected families. (ANTARA News)
  • Announced plans to cancel certain debts for farmers affected by the floods. (IDN Financials)
  • Increased direct coordination with provincial governors and disaster agencies, personally touring affected districts. (IDN Times)
  • Mobilized security forces and logistics support across the affected regions. (suara.com)

These actions show the government is not inactive. The debate is about how the response is framed and resourced.

What This Means for Indonesia’s Future

The Sumatra floods highlight an inevitable reality: climate change and deforestation are increasing the frequency and intensity of disasters in Indonesia and across Southeast Asia. Experts and environmental groups have pointed to forest loss, mining impacts, and extreme weather patterns as underlying factors compounded by climate shifts. (The Australian)

Indonesia faces hard questions:

  • Should national disaster status be reserved only for historic catastrophes?
  • Or should it be used more often to signal urgency and unlock faster, larger-scale action?
  • How should disaster law evolve in a world where severe climate events are increasingly common?

The refusal to declare a national disaster in Sumatra is not just a technical decision. It is a reflection of how Indonesia’s leaders see governance, risk, and national solidarity.

For survivors in Aceh, North Sumatra, and West Sumatra, labels matter less than what help arrives, how fast it comes, and how inclusive it is. For the international community watching, Indonesia’s response is a test case in balancing national pride, legal frameworks, and the urgent needs of people in crisis.

This moment asks leaders to reconsider not just what they call a disaster but how they prepare for the next one. A national disaster definition may be more than a bureaucratic label. It could become a tool for saving lives and rebuilding futures when climate change makes such emergencies the new normal.


AM World (tameer.work88@gmail.com) is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!

The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact creator@newswav.com.