In a landmark decision, the Federal Court unanimously reinstated a High Court ruling ordering a lawyer and his legal firm to pay RM1.5 million in damages for negligence in a conveyancing transaction dating back 20 years.
Justice Mary Lim clarified that the Limitation Act only came into effect when the property buyers, Julian Chong and Asmah Mat, suffered actual damage, which occurred in 2014 when Bank Islam attempted to auction off their house. This ruling underscores the principle that legal action should commence upon the discovery of negligence, not when it initially occurs. The court also acknowledged Parliament's recognition of this principle through Section 6A of the Limitation Act.
The case originated from a conveyancing transaction involving the purchase of land from a Penang housing developer in 2004. However, the lawyers handling the transaction failed to consider that the property was charged to the bank, which had the right to auction off the entire property if the developer defaulted on their loan. Despite repeated inquiries from Chong and Asmah regarding the safety of their property following the developer's winding-up, the lawyers provided evasive answers and ultimately misled them into believing their house was secure.
The couple filed a lawsuit in 2016, alleging negligence on the part of the lawyers for failing to conduct a proper land title search and include appropriate provisions in the sale and purchase agreement. The High Court not only awarded damages for negligence but also compensation for the couple's pain and suffering due to being misled by the lawyers.
The Federal Court's decision sets a precedent for cases involving legal negligence, reaffirming the duty of care that solicitors owe to their clients. It highlights the importance of accountability within the legal profession and serves as a reminder that lawyers must act in their clients' best interests at all times.
This ruling also resolves uncertainty stemming from conflicting Court of Appeal decisions, providing clarity on the application of the Limitation Act in cases of legal negligence. Additionally, the court's award of RM100,000 in costs to the couple emphasizes the importance of access to justice for individuals who have been wronged by legal professionals.
Overall, the Federal Court's decision represents a significant victory for the rule of law and reinforces the principle that justice should prevail, even in cases involving legal professionals. It sends a clear message that negligence in the practice of law will not be tolerated and underscores the need for transparency, integrity, and accountability within the legal system.
Source: Link
felixwrite is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!
The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact Newswav.
