The sun over Kedah’s vast rice bowl used to be a blessing, a golden orb that promised a bountiful harvest. But today, for the 150,000 paddy farmers across Malaysia, that same sun feels like an adversary. In May 2026, as the "Godzilla El Niño" phenomenon scorches the northern states with temperatures hitting 42°C, the grain in the fields is shriveling, turning light and brittle before it can even be reaped. Farmers watch helplessly as their yields and their livelihoods evaporate in the heat.
This isn’t just a story about bad weather; it’s a story about a systemic failure that has left Malaysia’s food security hanging by a thread. While the global price of rice fluctuates wildly and domestic production struggles to meet barely 52% to 56% of national demand, a familiar debate has resurfaced with renewed fury: Why is Padiberas Nasional Bhd (Bernas) still buying local paddy at "floor prices" that barely cover the cost of a bag of fertilizer?
The Floor That Feels Like a Ceiling
For decades, the "floor price" the minimum guaranteed price at which the government or Bernas must buy paddy from farmers was stuck at RM1,200 per metric tonne. It wasn't until 2023 that it was nudged to RM1,300, and later increased to RM1,500 per metric tonne in 2025. On paper, this looks like progress. In reality, it is a pittance.
Farmers' groups, most notably the Malaysian Padi Farmers Brotherhood Organisation (Pesawah), have been vocal in demanding a floor price of at least RM1,800 to RM2,500 to cope with the skyrocketing costs of seeds, pesticides, and the rising price of diesel. When you factor in the "deduction" rates (pemutuan) where millers subtract weight for moisture or impurities a farmer often walks away with far less than the advertised floor price.
The institutional analysis here is bleak: we are essentially asking our farmers to subsidize the nation's cheap rice policy with their own poverty. By keeping the floor price low, Bernas maintains its profit margins on the import side, while the government avoids the political suicide of raising the ceiling price of local white rice for urban consumers.
The Imported Addiction
The irony is as thick as a bowl of nasi lemak. Malaysia is a land of fertile soil and ancient farming traditions, yet we are dangerously dependent on imports from Vietnam, Thailand, and India. As of early 2026, experts warn that our self-sufficiency level (SSL) is failing to improve significantly because the economic incentive to grow rice is disappearing.
Why sweat in a 40°C field when the returns are marginal? Many younger generations are abandoning the family plot for factory work or gig economy jobs in the city. This exodus is a direct result of the low purchase price. If Bernas were mandated to increase the floor price significantly, it would act as a massive injection of morale and capital into the rural economy.
However, critics and some agricultural economists argue that a sudden jump such as the RM3,000 floor price proposed by some political factions could trigger a "domino effect," doubling the price of rice for the average Malaysian family and potentially fueling inflation across the entire food sector.
The Monopoly Question: Profit vs. Patriotism
At the heart of this storm sits Bernas. As the sole gatekeeper of rice imports in Malaysia, Bernas operates under a social obligation to maintain the national stockpile and manage the floor price. Yet, its status as a private monopoly controlled by corporate interests has long been a point of contention.
In 2022, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim famously reprimanded the owner of Bernas, urging the company to share its import profits with the struggling farmers. While Bernas has since contributed tens of millions to various funds, many feel these are "one-off" band-aids rather than structural cures.
The analysis suggests that as long as it is more profitable to import rice than to invest in local production, the status quo will remain. To truly fix the system, the purchase price must be decoupled from corporate profit targets and re-aligned with the actual cost of living for the 21st-century farmer.
The Cost of "Cheap" Food
We often brag about how affordable our rice is compared to our neighbors, but we rarely discuss the hidden cost. The cost is the 20% to 30% of crops currently left unharvested in Kedah because farmers cannot afford the diesel to run the harvesters in the extreme heat. The cost is the 98% reliance on imported fertilizers that leaves us vulnerable to global supply chain shocks.
When we squeeze the farmer, we aren't just saving a few sen at the supermarket; we are eroding the foundation of our national security. If a global crisis or another "Godzilla" weather event shuts down the export markets in Vietnam or India tomorrow, our RM1,500 floor price won't matter because there will be no local rice left to buy.
A Future Written in Mud and Sweat
The solution requires more than just a higher number on a government circular. It requires a radical shift in how we value the person standing in the mud. Boosting the floor price isn't "charity"; it's a strategic investment. A higher price attracts technology, encourages the adoption of better seed varieties, and, most importantly, keeps the next generation of farmers on the land.
There is also the cultural dimension. Rice isn't just a carbohydrate in Malaysia; it is our identity. From the padi fields of Sekinchan to the terraces of Bario, it defines our landscape and our soul. When we allow the economic lifeblood of these communities to thin out, we lose a piece of our heritage.
What do you think? I’d love to hear your opinion in the comments section.
It is easy to sit in an air-conditioned café in Kuala Lumpur, scrolling through a news app, and complain when the price of a bag of rice goes up by a ringgit. We view food security as an abstract policy issue, something for ministers to debate in Parliament. But for the man in Pendang or Kota Setar, whose skin is darkened by a sun that won't quit and whose hands are calloused by a labor that barely pays for his children’s schoolbooks, this isn't an abstract debate. It is a daily struggle for dignity.
We have reached a crossroads where the old ways of "managing" the rice industry are no longer sustainable. We cannot continue to demand "cheap" food while the costs of production climate, fuel, and fertilizer are anything but cheap. To ignore the call for a higher floor price is to tell our farmers that their labor has no value, and that their survival is secondary to a corporate balance sheet.
If we want a future where Malaysia can truly feed itself, we must be willing to pay the real price for it. We must decide if we value the resilience of our rural heartlands more than the convenience of an artificially low price tag. Every grain of rice on our plate tells a story of sweat, risk, and hope. It’s time we made sure that story doesn't end in a tragedy of neglect.
AM World (tameer.work88@gmail.com) is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!
The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact creator@newswav.com.