My client was a jovial young lady who had purchased her first home, a RM 700k 1200 sqft condo back in 2018.
The Sale & Purchase Agreement stated handover in 36 months. This timeline came and went. 48 months passed... 60 months.... 72 months.
As you might expect, before closing the sale, the agent and developer staff were enthusiastic and responsive. But after, their tone changed to ghosting and evasive. My Client's messages, calls and emails were consistently ignored.
Meanwhile, the housing loan bank didn’t care. My client was servicing the loan every month... paying interest on a property she couldn’t even step into. On top of that, she had to rent another place just to live.
She was paying for two roofs, but owning none in reality.
Finally, in mid 2025, after a total of approx. 7 years, my Client finally got her keys. She was relieved, but of course still pissed that she had waited double the promised time. She rightfully wanted to know her remedies and options.
She texted me on Facebook and we arranged a call. I told her that this is where the Sale and Purchase Agreement would do its job; specifically a mighty little clause known as a "Liquidated Ascertained Damages" (LAD) provision.
The clause was straightforward: the developer gets 36 months to complete the unit. Recent case law had established that this timeline starts from the payment of the booking fee (my Client had paid RM 500 to "book" the unit). If the developer misses this deadline, a daily penalty kicks in, calculated at 10% p.a. on the purchase price.
As with many similar cases we had done, the developer rolled out the usual excuses: Extension of time, construction delays, COVID disruptions... biasa la.
These excuses might sound reasonable on the surface but they will fall apart under scrutiny. Because housing development SPAs are regulated, and LAD is not just a "suka-suka" contractual term you can talk your way out of. It has a statutory backbone. If you want an extension of time to complete construction, you do it properly and within the legal framework. You do not just say “things are difficult”, "cashflow is tight" and expect these excuses to stick. The law protecting homebuyers does not operate on sympathy.
We kept it simple and wrote to the developer, exhibiting the SPA, the "booking form" and relevant receipts. We identified when delivery was actually supposed to happen and compared the date against when it actually happened.
Based on our calculations, our Client was actually entitled to more than RM 200k in LAD.
The developer replied 2 weeks later, offering a "goodwill rebate" of RM 15,000.00
My Client said to me "Ask them to fly kite, let's take them to court."
I agreed with her stance and we filed a Writ and Statement of Claim the following week.
The developer hired their own lawyers who promptly wrote to us with a much more reasonable offer of RM 150,000 in full and final settlement; spread out among six monthly post dated cheques.
I communicated the offer to my Client, and finally she decided to accept the same.
Many buyers have been in this position. They do nothing or accept gigantic discounts, taking the L just to move on. Gladly, my client had the ovaries of steel needed to stick through the process with us and get paid.
Rudi Cheu (rudi@rulecolaw.com) is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!
The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact creator@newswav.com.