Death penalty for murderers. Yes or no? The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) dubbed the penalty ineffective.
In response to 6 former UPNM cadets’ death penalty for the murder of Zulfarhan Osman Zulkarnain, SUHAKAM urged the government to reconsider the Court of Appeal’s decision to sentence them to death.
“While we share in the grief and anguish of the family and recognize the severity of the crime, SUHAKAM stands resolutely against the use of the death penalty.”
SUHAKAM has a reason for that.
The organisation believes the death penalty is an irreversible punishment that robs the possibility of rehabilitation.
In its official statement, SUHAKAM also said the Court of Appeal’s decision “marks a sad and solemn moment in Malaysia’s judicial history.”
Rehab makes offenders responsible
SUHAKAM added that the possibility of rehabilitation allows the offenders to improve and become constructive members of society. To them, the rehab approach not only addresses the problems’ roots but also emphasises understanding and empathy, and it will prevent history from repeating itself.
In case you missed it, a former UPNM cadet, Zulfarhan, was tortured for days before his death by the 6 suspects, who have been sentenced to death. Post-mortem revealed multiple bruises and scars on Zulfarhan’s body that were caused by the usage of steam iron, including on his private part.
Rest in peace, Zulfarhan.
What do you think of SUHAKAM’s take on this matter?
Also read: “With forgiveness, I feel relieved” Zulfarhan’s Father Forgives All The Accused For His Son’s Death
This post first appeared on WORLD OF BUZZ.
