Political analysts now suggest that Ikatan Prihatin Rakyat (IPR) may serve only as a temporary fallback for Muhyiddin Yassin should the leadership crisis within Perikatan Nasional (PN) continue to drag on. They argue that PN, with its established election machinery and organisational strength, remains the far superior platform.
For context, Ikatan Prihatin Rakyat (IPR) is a loose political coalition formed as an alternative platform for opposition cooperation outside Perikatan Nasional (PN), comprising smaller and largely marginal parties such as Pejuang, Urimai, Putra, Berjasa, MUDA, Gerakan, MIPP, the Malaysian Advancement Party, and the National Indian Muslim Alliance Party, with PAS nominally involved but largely absent from its leadership activities. Unlike PN, IPR lacks a clear ideological direction, cohesive leadership structure, and proven electoral machinery, functioning more as a political discussion forum and fallback platform for leaders facing internal party or coalition crises—most notably Muhyiddin Yassin—rather than as a serious and viable electoral alliance capable of mounting a competitive challenge in national elections.
This brings us back to an old question: Is it better to be the head of a rat or the tail of a dragon?
At first glance, the answer seems simple — better to lead than to follow. But in reality, the correct answer is: it depends.
It depends on who you are.
If you are a confident, capable, and talented person trapped in an organisation that constantly undervalues and suppresses you, then yes — you should leave. Even if the new organisation is smaller, joining a place that recognises and rewards merit can unlock your full potential.
But if you are merely average — middling in talent, competence, and leadership — yet have been elevated into a high position by a powerful organisation, then the rational move is to appreciate what you already have, not resent what you lack.
In fact, even if such a person is demoted, remaining within that powerful structure still leaves them in a position far above what their abilities naturally justify. To leave in pursuit of greater personal status is not ambition — it is self-delusion.
Because when a mediocre leader leaves an established organisation to head a smaller, weaker one that mistakes status for ability, two disasters occur simultaneously:
First, the leader ends up in a weaker position than before.
Second, the organisation itself is dragged into decline.
This is precisely the context in which Muhyiddin Yassin’s flirtation with IPR should be understood.
Analysts correctly note that IPR offers Muhyiddin visibility and nominal leadership. But leadership without power, machinery, or electoral viability is symbolic, not strategic. It is the head of a rat, not the tail of a dragon.
A mound of dirt does not become more valuable than a nugget of gold simply because it is larger.
IPR may consist of half a dozen parties, but none of them carry serious electoral weight. The only party in the opposition ecosystem that possesses genuine political value is PAS. Without PAS, neither PN nor IPR has meaningful electoral prospects.
It is true that PAS also needs allies. But there is a crucial asymmetry here. PAS suffers inconvenience without allies. Its partners suffer annihilation without PAS.
PAS may struggle to win alone. But Bersatu, Gerakan, MIPP and the rest face near-certain obliteration without PAS.
This is why political analyst Azmi Hassan is correct: PAS remains the dominant pillar. Without it, both PN and IPR become hollow shells.
Ultimately, the opposition faces only one real question:
Do they want to win — or not?
If victory is their objective, then the answer is simple:
Remove Muhyiddin. Replace him with Hamzah Zainudin. Stabilise PN. Preserve unity.
But if instead they persist in convoluted manoeuvres — scheming to reinstall Muhyiddin at the helm of PN, or threatening to abandon PAS in order to cluster under Muhyiddin within the untested and incoherent IPR — then they should understand exactly how this will look: like desperation, not strategy.
Politics rewards winners.
It tolerates challengers.
But it avoids losers like the plague.
If Bersatu, Gerakan, MIPP and others leave PN and PAS simply to secure Muhyiddin’s leadership in IPR, they will not appear principled. They will appear delusional.
And the electoral consequences will reflect that.
PAS may fail to win the next general election. But Bersatu, Gerakan, MIPP and the entire motley crew of IPR will not merely lose — they will be crushed.
In politics, as in life, it is far better to be the tail of a dragon than the head of a rat.
Because power, not ego, determines survival.
TheRealNehruism (nehru.sathiamoorthy@gmail.com) is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!
The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact creator@newswav.com.