Just three minutes of high-intensity exercise can offer greater benefits for overall health than a moderate-intensity 90-minute workout, a new study suggests.
This may seem counterintuitive, but researchers say the difference is shown in people’s blood - so less, can really mean more.
Nearly 20 healthy men who ran 30-second sprints over the course of one 23-minute session had more molecules in their bloodstream tied to improvements in muscle, liver, intestinal, immune and organ health than men who rode bikes for 90 minutes.
Blood samples showed that moderate treadmill running led to fewer of these molecules in the blood than the 30-second sprints.
“What’s exciting here is that just a few minutes of intense exercise can trigger a significant molecular response,” cardiologist Dr. Paul Cohen, who leads the molecular metabolism lab at New York’s Rockefeller University, said in a statement.
“And we still see it after eight weeks of training, which tells us this response isn’t simply a product of the body struggling to keep up with unfamiliar stress. It may be that the responses we observed are intrinsic to intense exercise.”
The researchers drew blood before the workout, during, immediately after the workout and three hours later.
The samples indicated that there was an immediate surge in levels of more than 700 proteins that lower the risk of cardiovascular and metabolic disease in the men who sprinted, researchers found.
But only seven such proteins changed in the blood of the bike-riding men during the activity - and only a dozen more changed after three hours.
The findings add to scientists’ understanding of how exercise is tied to improvements in health.
Researchers have long made the connection between the two - but exactly how exercise helps people to live longer and stave off deadly disease has yet to be pinned down.
The study indicates that exercise changes the body, but not all intensities are equal. However, women were not included in the study and it was relatively small. Future research with a wider pool of participants could shed more light on how widely applicable the findings are.
“We know exercise is associated with beneficial health outcomes,” Cohen told The Washington Post on Wednesday. “But we don’t have a deep understanding of how that occurs and how different organs signal to one another during and after exercise.”
Read MoreIs running bad for your joints? New research challenges the widespread assumption
Stop reading your textbook and taking notes to study. Here’s what to do instead
From Jellyfish Parents to Total Amandas – how to survive the school gates
The Japanese walking method that can improve heart health and is gentler on joints
Doctors issue warning after children suffer ‘toasted skin’ from overusing devices
Drinking very hot tea and coffee can triple your risk of cancer, Oxford study finds
