
JK Rowling has described as “nonsensical” past comments made by Anneliese Dodds on gender as the Labour MP was announced as part of the new Government’s women and equalities team.
The Harry Potter author has previously accused Labour of having “abandoned” her and others campaigning for women’s rights.
Ms Rowling has become known as a fierce advocate for the rights of biological women after criticising Scottish Government proposals to introduce self-identification for transgender people.
Woman's Hour, March 8, 2022
— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) July 8, 2024
Emma Barnes: And Labour’s definition of a woman?
Annaliese Dodds: Well, I have to say that there are different definitions legally around what a woman actually is. I mean you look at the definition within the Equality Act and I think it just says… https://t.co/su448ikI2V
Ms Dodds was appointed as a minister of state for women and equalities on Monday, serving under Bridget Phillipson who has been made Minister for Women and Equalities.
Shortly after the announcement, Ms Rowling tweeted part of a transcript from an interview Ms Dodds had done on BBC Radio 4’s Woman’s Hour in 2022.
According to the posted transcript, when asked for Labour’s definition of a woman, Ms Dodds said there are “different definitions legally around what a woman actually is” and, when pressed again, said: “I think it does depend what the context is.”
Ms Rowling tweeted: “And if you happen to be wondering how I have the transcript of that Woman’s Hour to hand, it was sent to me by Dodds’ office after I publicly criticised her prevarication on the programme.
“They seemed to think I’d find her comments less nonsensical if I saw them in print.”
Ms Dodds, in her time as shadow women and equalities secretary, affirmed Labour’s commitment to “trans people and women” and criticised the demonisation of vulnerable people.
Last year she said Labour is “committed to modernising the Gender Recognition Act”.
In an article for The Guardian, she added: “Changing gender is not a decision anyone makes lightly. The process is intrusive, outdated and humiliating.
“So we will modernise, simplify and reform the gender recognition law to a new process. We will remove invasive bureaucracy and simplify the process.”
Meanwhile, Ms Phillipson has previously warned against “picking fights, seeking headlines” on issues around gender.
During the election campaign Ms Phillipson said she wanted to take the heat out of the row over transgender guidance for schools.
“Let’s stop this being a political football,” she told the BBC. “This is our children’s lives, their wellbeing, it’s too important to make this a culture wars issue on the front pages of newspapers.”
Draft guidance, published before the election was called, stated that England’s schools should not teach about the concept of gender identity.
Asked if she would ditch the proposed ban, Ms Phillipson said trans people’s “existence should be recognised” before saying discussion on the issue “drifts sometimes into a slightly bizarre conversation”.
She has also previously said “statutory guidance” on single-sex spaces would be set out by a Labour government.
Last month, she said: “I do believe in the importance of single-sex provision, but I also believe that trans people have the right to appropriate care as well. I don’t think it is about one or the other.”
The Conservative government had, before the election was called, announced plans to overhaul the NHS Constitution to “ensure that biological sex is respected”, referring to proposals to ensure hospital patients in England have the right to request to be treated on single-sex wards, with transgender people placed in rooms on their own.

