The late Queen was “very keen” for Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor to take on a “prominent role in the promotion of national interests” before he was appointed trade envoy, newly released documents show.
In a memo to then-foreign secretary Robin Cook, senior official Sir David Wright said the monarch’s “wish” had been for the then-Duke of York to succeed her cousin the Duke of Kent in the job.
The then-chief executive of British Trade International said he had a “wide-ranging discussion” with the Queen’s private secretary before proposing a “suitable role” be identified for her son as his career in the Royal Navy came to an end.
Sir David suggested the posting would include some regional trips and two or three overseas visits each year, as well as a “leading trade mission from time to time”.
He said he “did not envisage that the Duke of York would want to be burdened with the regularity of meetings of the board” of BTI or “the burden of paper which goes along with the board membership”.
The Duke of Kent, was planning to withdraw from his role as a special representative for trade, and that she wished for him to “be succeeded in this role by the Duke of York”, the memo, dated February 25 2000, said.
“The Duke of Kent is to relinquish his responsibilities around April next year. That would fit well with the end of the Duke of York’s active naval career,” Sir David wrote.
The memo was released on Thursday as part of a trove of files related to Andrew’s appointment to the post, which gave him access to senior government and business contacts around the world.
He became the UK’s special representative for international trade and investment in 2001, but stepped down 10 years later amid the furore over his friendship with paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein.
Another document showed efforts were made to stop Andrew, who earned the nicknames “Air Miles Andy” and “Playboy Prince” for his globe-trotting and apparent penchant for leisure, from being offered “golfing functions” overseas.
The then-duke also “tended to prefer the more sophisticated countries” and favoured “ballet rather than the theatre”, according to the files.
A letter from then-head of protocol division Kathryn Colvin said: “Captain Blair (Andrew’s then-personal private secretary) particularly asked that the Duke of York should not be offered golfing functions abroad.
“This was a private activity and if he took his clubs with him he would not play in any public sense.”
Ms Colvin wrote that she had been told he was “particularly good on high-tech matters, trade, youth (including primary schools and outward bound projects), cultural events, with a preference for ballet rather than theatre, the Commonwealth and military and foreign affairs”.
Staff at BTI were also warned that the then-duke’s “high public profile (not, of course, exclusive to his BTI function)” would require “careful and sometimes strict media media management”.
The internal telegram sent in September 2001 said this would be “an important factor in considering engagements for inclusion in the programme” with initial proposals requiring a media strategy to be developed jointly with the Palace.
Some lines have been redacted, which the Government says is to “remove the bare minimum of personal information and information whose release would prejudice international relations”.
In another memo dated January 2000, Ms Colvin said “Sir D Wright” would “welcome” the then-prince, who already conducted some overseas trips, taking on “more commitments,” and had “in mind that that the Duke of York would play a similar role to that of the Duke of Kent.”
Efforts also appear to have been made to prepare for questions from the press about Andrew’s qualifications for the role.
One briefing document, titled “media Q&A for Duke of York role announcement”, says: “But he is not very experienced. Why not someone better placed?”
The suggested answer says: “The importance of the Duke of York’s involvement lies in the high profile and commitment he is able to give to this as a member of the royal family.”
It adds: “The Duke will bring valuable support and visibility to BTI’s activities at home and abroad.”
Another answer elsewhere in the tranche suggests the then-prince say: “Has been a steep learning curve for me. But I relish the challenge. Hope to make a difference.”
Andrew received no salary for travelling around the world and at home promoting Britain’s business interests, but criticisms were made about the thousands of pounds spent each year on his expenses and travel costs.
His decision to quit the role came in the same year he was pictured with his arm around his primary accuser, Virginia Giuffre, who said she was trafficked to the former duke at the home of convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell.
Ms Giuffre claimed she had sex with the former prince three times – at Maxwell’s home in London, at Epstein’s New York townhouse and on the disgraced financier’s Caribbean island, Little St James.
Andrew paid Ms Giuffre millions of pounds to settle a civil suit in the US in 2022, a woman he has claimed never to have met.
The former duke also faces accusations of sharing sensitive information with Epstein during his time as trade envoy.
Thursday’s publication comes after the Liberal Democrats tabled Commons motion demanding the Government release files related to his appointment, including any vetting and any correspondence from disgraced former US ambassador Lord Peter Mandelson.
It is shocking that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was made a trade envoy with no vetting. Nobody should be above basic standards. The government must commit to mandatory vetting for future roles.
— Liberal Democrats (@LibDems) May 21, 2026
The survivors of Jeffrey Epstein deserve a full public inquiry into his UK links. pic.twitter.com/8uBGztvhIJ
Trade minister Sir Chris Bryant said the Government had found “no evidence” of any formal due diligence of checks having been carried out before he took on the role.
He said this was “understandable” in light of Andrew’s appointment being a “continuation of the royal family’s involvement in trade and investment promotion” and succeeding the Duke of Kent’s similar position.
Downing Street said a further tranche of files relating to the appointment are to be published at a future date, but Sir Chris appeared to contradict this while addressing the commons later on Thursday.
“I guarantee the House that if there is more to publish, I will come back to the House with more, but I suspect this may be our last tranche,” he said.
Andrew was arrested in February on suspicion of misconduct in public office and later released under investigation.
The former prince has vehemently denied any wrongdoing.
The Lib Dems criticised the “small paper trail” released by the Government in relation to Andrew’s appointment.
“The lack of documentation provided is itself concerning, as is the time it has taken to get this far. We must get the full files from government without delay,” chief whip Wendy Chamberlain said.
Read MoreQueen pushed for Andrew to get prominent trade role, files reveal
Rami Malek explores art, love and death in Ira Sachs' Cannes entry 'The Man I Love'
Police warning over extended World Cup pub opening hours
Trial date for Evangelos Marinakis’ High Court libel claim set
UK net migration drops below 200,000 for first time since Covid-19 pandemic
Charles shows off ukulele skills as Camilla enjoys ice cream during royal visit
