.png)
THE Kuala Lumpur High Court’s decision rejecting former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s bid to serve the remainder of his prison sentence under home detention underscores the centrality of the Constitution and the rule of law in Malaysia.
Judge Alice Loke Yee Ching ruled that the matter of home detention was never discussed at the Pardons Board meeting on 29 January last year, closing speculation surrounding the Royal Addendum (Titah Adendum).
The ruling reinforces the fundamental principle that courts must act strictly on the basis of facts, legal documentation, and proper procedure.
While the decision may be welcomed or contested by different parties, it is incumbent upon all to respect the judiciary as a cornerstone of the national justice system.
Public commentary is permissible, but must remain within legal boundaries and avoid contemptuous or insulting remarks towards the court.
Regrettably, some comments targeting Najib and his associates have been disparaging, notably coming from leaders within the ruling coalition itself rather than opposition figures, raising concerns over political maturity and the sincerity of coalition cooperation.
The coalition government, formed to promote national stability, requires parties to set aside certain partisan interests despite ideological differences.
Differences of opinion are inevitable in politics, especially within a coalition encompassing diverse ideologies and policy approaches, yet such differences should not be aired publicly in a way that undermines fellow coalition members.
In the context of the High Court ruling, coalition leaders are expected to act prudently, avoiding remarks that could strain relationships or erode trust among partner parties.
Respecting the court’s decision is a moral duty, and any attempts to disparage political figures linked to coalition partners are considered irresponsible and counterproductive.
The coalition government was established on a mandate from the people to ensure political stability, economic recovery, and national well-being.
Open conflict or public disparagement of coalition partners over judicial decisions undermines this mandate and diminishes the credibility of collaborative governance.
Regarding the Titah Adendum, judicial ruling, and public reactions, it is vital that these matters are not used as tools to ridicule any party, particularly those within the same coalition.
Leaders should prioritise harmony, respect for one another, and consensus-building rather than engaging in divisive rhetoric.
Also, in relation to the ruling, PKR Hang Tuah Jaya division chief Datuk Seri Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin emphasised today that discussions on mechanisms such as home detention must be conducted carefully, in accordance with constitutional principles and universal standards of justice.
Reflecting on the court’s ruling and the sentiments expressed by Najib, Shamsul Iskandar said that any implementation of sentences or detention methods must strictly comply with legal provisions and judicial procedures.
“In Malaysia’s history, home detention has never been formally legislated. In 2016, the government officially stated that there is no specific legal framework for home detention.
“Based on this, proposals for serving sentences at home, including for considerations of health or humanitarian reasons, cannot be implemented,” he said.
He added that the approach underscores the fundamental principle that the law must be applied consistently, regardless of individual, political position, or background.
Shamsul urged all parties, including DAP and UMNO members, to exercise restraint and demonstrate political maturity by refraining from statements that could be interpreted as celebrating the court’s ruling.
“Judicial decisions touch on public emotion, institutional dignity, and the sense of justice among citizens. They should be approached with responsibility and empathy. This does not close the door to discussion, sympathy, or reform.
“Let us all, regardless of party or ideology, maintain calm, civility, and respect for national institutions, the legal process, and the sentiments of fellow citizens,” he said. - December 23, 2025