Monitoring Media Coverage of the Myanmar Pro-Democracy Movement

World
29 May 2024 • 6:30 PM MYT
Faraz
Faraz

A dedicated journalist and storyteller committed to making an impact

image is not available
Street protest, Myanmar 2021. Photo Pyae Sone Htun, Unsplashvia [Kyoto Review]

The pro-democracy movement in Myanmar has attracted tremendous attention from mainstream media and social media over the last three years. The movement has gained much visibility after the military coup on February 1, 2021, which ended the democratic leadership of Aung San Suu Kyi and the National League for Democracy. The coup has plunged Myanmar into extensive grassroots protests and intense civil disobedience—with the population representing a broad spectrum of life, demanding the reinstatement of their democratically elected government and the release of political detainees. The struggle was based on the historical struggle for a democratic government in Myanmar. There is a long historical period of military dictatorship, which, on a few occasions, was hectored by short periods of democratic government.

In 2021, the coup marked an end to a decade-long existence of democracy and reignited the age-old correlation between authoritarianism and democracy within the state. The critical agenda put forward by the pro-democracy movement is the fight against military dictatorship, the defense of human rights, and the establishment of a proper democratic system of governance in Myanmar. The movement is led and represented by a broad coalition of activists, students, workers, and ordinary citizens.

The prominent leaders of this movement are Min Ko Naing, one of the veterans of the 1988 pro-democracy protests, and leaders of the Committee Representing Pyidaungsu Hluttaw, which consists of elected lawmakers who were denied the right to exercise their functions after the coup d'état. Young activists and members of the Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM) have also been quite influential in organizing and maintaining activity during the days and nights of protest. Min Ko Naing is a veteran of activism and imprisonment; he personifies the tenacity and continuity of efforts toward democracy in Myanmar. The CRPH embodies the institutional legitimacy of the democratic process because it consists of elected representatives. This movement mainly expresses itself on social media like Facebook, Twitter, and Telegram. It has played a significant role on these platforms regarding protest organizations, the information provided to the country's population, and international cooperation. This is of the utmost importance in colonial media, where information is provided about the military's actions and disseminated to the country's people. Social media has played a vital role in shaping attitudes and coordination among activists, hence helping to sustain protest energy in such a repressive environment.

Central Problems Pointed Out by the Movement

All these significant problems identified by pro-democracy demonstrators in Myanmar involve gross human rights violations, demands for the return of democracy, and the tremendous power of civil disobedience. Among them, the most critical are gross human rights violations committed by the military regime. Activists and observers from abroad strongly argue that unrestrained arbitrary detentions, tortures, and extrajudicial killings are standard practices in the country. The violent crackdown of the military junta on peaceful protesters has been a center of media attention, where numerous reports documented the extent to which the junta is going the most extreme measures to quiet the revolt (Al Jazeera, 2021; Middle East Institute, 2021).

The third central issue maintained by the movement is the restoration of democracy. It has been demanded to return the democratically elected government and the release of all political prisoners, including Aung San Suu Kyi and the other NLD leaders. This demand springs from the larger goal of seeing a governance framework that honors the will of the people and works within the principles of democracy. Two major groups have come forth in the international scene as a result of the coup: the Committee Representing Pyidaungsu Hluttaw (CRPH) and the National Unity Government, both vying for international recognition and support in their efforts.

The CDM has also shown the strength of united collective action and non-cooperation with the military regime. In this regard, the movement has been calling for the striking of government workers and refusal to cooperate with the junta. The aim was to disorganize the day-to-day running of the military-controlled administration. The action is being highly supported by people in healthcare, education, and public service sectors—literally crippling parts of the state machinery and proving that the resistance to the military rule is widespread and deep (FairPlanet, 2021). In so doing, the movement put under the spotlight the economic and social effects of the coup, accruing even more support for their cause at home and abroad.

Media Portrayal of Activists and Their Activities

The media has portrayed these pro-democracy activists and movements differently, depending on the channel and outlet. These three essential stories summarize well how the activists, their messages, and their demands are captured:

1. Al Jazeera: It must always be noted that in its comprehensive coverage, Al Jazeera underlined the brutality of the military crackdown and the resilience of the protesters. In "Myanmar: Timeline of a fragile democracy," the activists were portrayed as people with courage and strong will. It was thrust on their peaceful protests and the kind of severe repression that took place. This coverage highlighted their demands as legitimate for democratic restoration and issues related to human rights. From here, the protesters are recorded as being very legitimate in their actions to restore democracy and human rights. (Al Jazeera, 2021)

2. Reuters: The article "Hundreds mourn Myanmar's 'Everything will be OK' protester" by Reuters detailed the tragic stories of young protesters who lost their lives during the demonstrations. Reuters highlighted the personal stories and sacrifices of the protesters, creating a humanized and empathetic portrayal of the movement (Reuters, 2021).

3. Middle East Institute: Equally, they commented in their analytical focus that the strategic arrangement's prophecies of the movement are regarding the establishment of the CRPH and National Unity Government. The article "Triple Crisis of Myanmar: Impact on the Pro-Democracy Movement" highlights how the activists have been so creative and innovative with their tactics in performing street performances and creating imaginative blockades. The reporting here was analytical in providing a nuanced view of the strategies of the movement and the challenges it faced (Middle East Institute, 2021).

Taken together, the accounts cast the activists as a hard-nosed, resilient, and monomaniacal bunch. The media have, likewise, largely reported their quest for human rights and democracy as just and pressing. Their portrayal, for the most part, has been sympathetic and focused on the pacifism of the protests and the stringency of the military response.

Analysis of Bias, Tone, and Framing

One can observe several biases, tones, and framing techniques evident in the media coverage. The primary tones exposed by Al Jazeera, Reuters, and the Middle East Institute are warm, warming the message and exposing them to the activists as resisters and fighters against the negative issues. Quite often, their reports underscore the heavy-handedness of the military crackdown and the peaceful nature of the protests, in which case the activists are framed as brave defenders of democracy. This favorable light of portrayal galvanizes international support and stops at nothing less than calling for attention to human rights abuse in Myanmar.

However, there is a perceptible bias in the selective reporting of events: too much emphasis is put on the negative actions of the military junta and too little on capturing the internal workings and challenges of the pro-democracy movement. Most of the tone in which these reports have been set is that of urgency and condemnation, which, though effective in driving home the gravity of the situation, at times can oversimplify to the point of caricature the complex topography of Myanmar affairs.

It constructs narratives to put the heroic acts of the activists over the humane acts of the military, which presents a near-binary and exclusion of many gray areas surrounding the conflict. Moreover, the resistance by the media control of the state in Myanmar has been discrediting the activities of the activists as terrorists and criminals in justification of the actions.

In conclusion, the storyline of the pro-democracy movement in Myanmar is arguably one of the most intensively covered social movements in recent years. In this regard, some of the most crucial involvements in broadcasting the plight of the Myanmar people would have to involve Al Jazeera, DW, and the Middle East Institute. This movement has been able to appropriately raise the grave human rights abuses and expose the need for the restoration of democracy in Myanmar.

The majority of the media supported the movement, actively disseminating its messages and advocating for its demands. The one significant drawback, however, was the prejudiced and acerbic reportage by state-controlled media in Myanmar. If they were to engage with the media more, it should be done with a focus on creating better and more coherent stories across all platforms in a resonating and consistent way. This would ensure that their voices are heard, especially when the regime tries to silence them. It would also benefit them to engage more agilely with international influencers and adapt to more advanced digital tools for secure communications.

References

Faraz is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!

The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact Newswav.