Najib has Option to Seek Royal Pardon But Must Abandon Appeal to the Pardon

Politics
4 Jan 2026 • 1:30 PM MYT
Kamran
Kamran

A freelance content creator

image is not available
Malay Mail

Former prime minister Najib Razak now faces a critical legal crossroads following his latest corruption conviction, with lawyers saying he must choose between pursuing an appeal or seeking royal clemency in the 1MDB case.

On December 26, 2025, the High Court in Putrajaya found Najib guilty of multiple offences linked to the misappropriation of 1MDB funds. The court imposed a 15-year prison sentence and a fine of RM11.4 billion after convicting him on four counts of abuse of power and 21 counts of money laundering involving RM2.28 billion that flowed into his AmBank accounts between February 2011 and December 2014.

Lawyers clarified that a pardon petition can only be made once all legal avenues have been exhausted or formally abandoned. As such, Najib would be required to waive his right to appeal before submitting an application for clemency to the Federal Territories Pardons Board. While the law does not impose a strict deadline for filing a pardon petition, it requires that such applications be made as soon as practicable.

Najib’s defence team has already signalled an intention to appeal, with a notice required to be filed within 14 days of sentencing. If the appeal proceeds, the pardon option would only become available after the conclusion of the judicial process.

The court also ordered that the 15-year sentence in the 1MDB case will commence only after Najib completes his existing six-year prison term for the SRC International case, which is scheduled to end on August 23, 2028. This means the cumulative jail time could extend well beyond a decade unless relief is granted through legal or executive channels.

Legal experts further noted that the law does not bar multiple pardon applications. This leaves open the possibility for Najib to submit a fresh clemency plea for the SRC case, depending on circumstances and the advice provided by the attorney-general to the King under Article 42 of the Federal Constitution.

Historical precedents, including cases where sentences were reduced following successive clemency petitions, were cited as examples of how such processes can evolve, though outcomes remain highly discretionary.


Kamran (kfiverr21@gmail.com) is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!

The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact creator@newswav.com.