Malaysia was sold to Sabah and Sarawak as a bridge – a federation of equals, three partners forming one new nation under MA63. It was supposed to stitch the seas together, not carve a fault line through the country. Yet six decades on, that bridge feels more like a border: West on one side, East on the other – one holding the levers of power, the other carrying the weight of promises never kept.
On paper, Sabah did not simply “join” Malaya; Sabah, Sarawak and Malaya formed Malaysia, with safeguards, special powers and a 40% net revenue entitlement that recognised Borneo as a co-founder, not a distant province. In practice, the federal machinery acted as if Malaysia were merely an enlarged Malaya – centralising taxation, concentrating decision-making in Putrajaya, and slowly hollowing out the original spirit of equal partnership. https://jier.um.edu.my/index.php/JMCL/article/download/61843/18386
Sabah’s reality is the most jarring. This is a land rich in oil, gas, timber, palm oil and tourism – yet it is consistently ranked among the poorest, if not the poorest, states in Malaysia. Oil and gas flow out through pipelines and tankers, timber and palm oil leave by sea, and tourists transit through glossy airports, but much of the value is captured by federal agencies, national oil companies and conglomerates headquartered far from Sabah’s kampungs and interior towns. What returns to districts like Pitas, Tongod, Kota Marudu, or Telupid too often looks like gravel roads, intermittent electricity and students climbing hills just to find mobile signal. https://www.theborneopost.com/2025/03/09/the-economy-of-sabah-wealth-distribution-and-persistence-of-poverty/
This is not an accident of geography; it is the outcome of policy and power. When a resource-rich state contributes billions in hydrocarbons yet receives only a narrow 5% royalty, while negotiations for a fairer share drag on or are wrapped in political messaging, the imbalance is clear. When a court has to rule that withholding Sabah’s 40% revenue entitlement is unlawful, it exposes how far the federation has drifted from the original MA63 bargain. https://www.rockstarmedia.com.my/2025/11/mof-denies-petronas-sabah-sarawak-oil.html
Within Sabah, centralisation also empowered a small local elite who became brokers between Putrajaya and the resource frontier. Timber licences, land banks, plantations and major contracts clustered around a narrow circle, while the state’s fiscal position weakened despite decades of extraction. Ordinary Sabahans watched their forests shrink, and rivers turn muddy, yet many households still grapple with poor schools, patchy healthcare and a cost of living often higher than in the Klang Valley. https://bridgetwelsh.com/articles/poverty-sabahs-most-pressing-woe/
The result is a Malaysia split not only by the South China Sea but also by lived experience. In Malaysia, highways, MRT lines and research universities symbolise progress. In the other, parents ration their children’s school opportunities and workers earn low wages while paying peninsula-level prices, partly due to long-standing policy choices that made logistics to Borneo more expensive. Both are “Malaysia” – yet one feels like the project's capital city, the other its sacrifice zone. https://theedgemalaysia.com/article/sabah-poor-dire-straits
This is the uncomfortable truth about “Malaysianisation”: the language of unity was used to justify centralisation, which quietly downgraded partners into dependencies. MA63 – the birth certificate of the federation – has too often been treated as a ceremonial document: invoked on anniversaries, sidelined in budgeting and revenue-sharing decisions. Instead of dismantling the old colonial pattern of “centre” and “periphery”, we shifted the centre from London to Kuala Lumpur, while leaving Sabah and Sarawak still stuck in the role of internal resource colonies. https://jesseltontimes.com/2021/12/15/peninsular-malaysia-sarawak-sabah-are-now-equal-partners-in-line-with-ma63/
If readers feel uncomfortable, they should. This is not just a “Sabah issue” or “Sarawak complaint”; it is a national democratic question. A federation that normalises extracting wealth from one side to build comfort on the other is not acting like a family. Fixing this will take more than new committees and polished slogans. It means honouring the original contract in spirit and in letter: restoring fiscal rights, decentralising real decision-making, and allowing Borneo to lead in shaping Malaysia’s next chapter – not merely to ask, again and again, for what was already promised. https://jesseltontimes.com/2024/10/21/the-political-tragedy-of-sabah-a-discourse-on-diminished-rights-and-economic-disparity/
Until that happens, every 16 September we will keep crossing the same symbolic bridge, waving the same flags and singing about the same “unity”. But for many in East Malaysia, that bridge still ends at a toll gate called Putrajaya – and on the wrong side of that gate, Malaysianisation has felt less like nation-building and more like being locked out of a house they helped build. https://jesseltontimes.com/2025/08/02/sabahs-economy-no-amount-of-polished-narratives-can-hide-the-reality/
Ramli Amir (ramgold@gmail.com) is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!
The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact creator@newswav.com.