OPINION | Akmal or Khairy? The UMNO Power Struggle Nobody Wants to Admit

Opinion
24 Jan 2026 • 4:30 PM MYT
AM World
AM World

A writer capturing headlines & hidden places, turning moments into words.

image is not available
Image credit: Malay Mail

Have you ever wondered why two leaders from the same party can spark such different reactions among Malaysians? Recent political scenes in Malaysia have pushed this question into the spotlight, with Dr Muhamad Akmal Saleh and Khairy Jamaluddin at the centre of heated debate about leadership, strategy and future direction. (Malay Mail)

At first glance, Akmal and Khairy might seem like two faces of UMNO’s youth-oriented politics. One is the current Youth chief pushing hard on ideological lines. The other is a seasoned ex-minister whose possible return to party politics excites both supporters and critics. Their contrasting styles of leadership reveal deeper divides within Malaysia’s largest Malay nationalist party, UMNO, and raise fundamental questions about what direction the party should take ahead of the next general election. This debate matters not just to UMNO members, but to all Malaysians who care about political stability and democratic evolution.

Profiles at a Glance

Dr Muhamad Akmal Saleh

• Younger generation UMNO figure, born 1988, trained as a doctor before entering politics.

• Youth Chief of UMNO and MLA for Merlimau, Malacca.

• Known for outspoken positions on race, religion and party direction. (Malay Mail)

• Recently resigned as Melaka state executive councillor to focus on political struggle. (Malay Mail)

Khairy Jamaluddin

• Veteran politician, former UMNO Youth chief (2009-2018) and ex-Cabinet minister. (The Sun Malaysia)

• Expelled from UMNO in 2023 but remains influential through media and public engagement. (Malay Mail)

• Known for media savvy and broad appeal among urban voters before his party exit. (The True Net)

Breaking Down the Political Divide

Leadership Style

Akmal

Dr Akmal has aggressively pushed narratives tied to Malay identity, religious issues and intra-party direction. At the recent UMNO Youth assembly, he warned that the party suffers from a “denial syndrome” for failing to confront electoral losses and disconnect from grassroots sentiment. (Malay Mail) His rhetoric is often combative, framed as defending party dignity and principles, even at the cost of political office, as seen in his resignation from the Melaka executive council while staying on as Youth chief. (Malay Mail)

Khairy

In contrast, Khairy’s leadership style is pragmatic and media-oriented. Before his expulsion, he became one of UMNO’s most recognisable figures nationally, communicating policy and political messages effectively with broader audiences. (The True Net) Since leaving active politics, he has maintained visibility through a popular podcast and selective public events, choosing measured engagement over incendiary rhetoric. (Malay Mail)

Relationship with the Party

Akmal’s Role in UMNO’s Internal Struggles

Akmal’s recent speeches have highlighted strategic tensions within UMNO about retaining shares in the Unity Government versus challenging coalition partners like DAP. At the UMNO Youth meeting, he pushed for internal honesty about UMNO’s trajectory and cautioned that ignoring electoral realities could weaken the party’s future. (Malay Mail)

Khairy’s Complex Return

Khairy’s recent appearance at the party assembly after nearly three years since his expulsion reflects a gradual rapprochement. He stated he attended only with explicit party approval, emphasised respect for UMNO’s decisions, and argued against abrupt withdrawal from the Unity Government to maintain stability. (Malay Mail)

Their dynamic resembles a generational tug between institutional loyalty and ideological fervour. Khairy embodies continuity and experience, while Akmal represents youthful assertiveness and internal reform pressures.

Public and Media Perception

Akmal’s Polarisation

Akmal’s rhetoric earns both praise and criticism. Supporters say he speaks directly for the grassroots and steadfastly defends Malay identity issues. Critics, including voices outside UMNO, accuse him of oversimplifying complex national matters and drifting into polarising narratives. (Malay Mail) This polarisation impacts UMNO’s image, causing some voters to question whether his approach broadens support or deepens divisions.

Khairy’s Broader Appeal

Before his ousting, Khairy was often seen as UMNO’s bridge to urban and moderate voters. Surveys once showed high popularity ratings for him among opposition leaders, indicating his communication appeal beyond strict party lines. (The True Net) This broader acceptance could help UMNO rebuild bridges among diverse voter segments, a key asset in national elections.

What Their Battle Symbolises Nationally

This confrontation isn’t just personal. It symbolises broader currents in Malaysian politics:

1) Ideology vs Pragmatism

Akmal’s assertive defence of core party symbols and stance on coalition partnerships points to ideological consolidation within UMNO. Khairy’s measured return underscores pragmatism and coalition diplomacy.

2) New Politics vs Legacy Politics

Akmal’s rise reflects a new cohort willing to challenge party elders and push bold, at times controversial, ideas. Khairy represents the legacy leadership that once guided UMNO through decades of dominance and seeks to update that legacy for contemporary challenges.

3) Youth Engagement vs Institutional Stability

UMNO’s youth wing shapes the party’s future narratives but must balance passion with electoral strategy. This tension is central to ensuring UMNO remains relevant nationally.

Expert Opinions and Diverse Views

Political analysts point out that UMNO’s internal rebalancing between grassroots demands and broad coalition strategies will determine its future. Some stress that Khairy’s media skills and broader appeal make him a strategic asset for national elections, while others argue that Akmal’s focus on party identity and grassroots patterns may strengthen core loyalties. None of these opinions is definitive, but all confirm a party in flux as Malaysia approaches key electoral cycles. (The Straits Times)

What do you think? I’d love to hear your opinion in the comments section.

There is no simple answer.

Akmal’s strengths lie in stirring debate, prioritising grassroots issues, and demanding party self-reflection. He galvanises a demographic seeking clarity on identity and direction.

Khairy’s strengths lie in communication, inclusiveness, and appealing to broader electorates. His leadership cultivates stability and practicable politics.

Malaysia’s democracy benefits most when leadership blends both qualities: bold ideas rooted in popular sentiment and disciplined strategy that appeals across communities. The real test will come at the ballot box, where voters will decide which style best represents their hopes for Malaysia’s future.


AM World (tameer.work88@gmail.com) is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!

The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact creator@newswav.com.