OPINION | DAP’s Dilemma: It Can Only Represent the Chinese When It Is NOT in Power

Opinion
3 Dec 2025 • 3:00 PM MYT
TheRealNehruism
TheRealNehruism

An award-winning Newswav creator, Bebas News columnist & ex-FMT columnist.

image is not available
Image credit: United Daily

The Sabah state election last weekend delivered a political earthquake for the Democratic Action Party (DAP). Once holding eight seats, DAP now holds zero. The party was wiped out—completely erased from the electoral map.

For a party that has for the last one or two decades, been the the sole credible representative of the Malaysian Chinese, what happened in Sabah is more than just an electoral setback. It is a warning sign. Sabahan Chinese voters abandoned DAP entirely. And if DAP is honest with itself, it must now confront an uncomfortable question:

Do the Chinese still see DAP as their representative?

Across Semenanjung, Chinese voters have historically rallied behind DAP after losing faith in MCA and Gerakan. But the mood on the ground, the grumbling at kopitiams, the bitterness in online spaces—all of it suggests that DAP may be walking into the same dilemma that every minority-based political party eventually faces in Malaysia.

And that dilemma is this:

A minority party in Malaysia can only represent its community’s aspirations as long as it is not in power.

Once it enters government, the very conditions that allow it to stay in power prevent it from representing the very people who put it there.

Why does this happen?

Because minorities in Malaysia—Chinese, Indians, Sabahans, Sarawakians—are fundamentally discontented. They are dissatisfied with the structural inequalities that define the Malaysian experience. They feel like second-class citizens. They want long-standing injustices dismantled. They want laws, institutions and policies redesigned so that they no longer live with systemic disadvantages.

When a minority party operates from outside the halls of power, it will articulate these grievances loudly. It will champion equality. It will call out injustice. It will demand reform.

But the moment it enters government, everything changes.

Power forces silence.

To hold power, the minority party must ally with the majority party. And the majority party will insist—explicitly or implicitly—that the minority partner silence its advocacy, mute its grievances, and “be reasonable” so as not to provoke backlash from the majority demographic.

Suddenly, instead of saying:

  • “This is unfair.”
  • “This needs to change.”
  • “This policy discriminates against us.”

…the minority party begins saying things like:

  • “Decades of wrongdoing cannot be corrected in one term.”
  • “Be patient—reform takes time.”
  • “We must see the bigger picture.”
  • “We have to sacrifice for national stability.”

In other words, a party that once articulated minority frustrations becomes a party that now manages minority frustrations.

And voters notice.

Supporters start to feel betrayed.

Minority voters begin to suspect that the party was using their grievances as a tool to gain power. And now that it has achieved power, it is unwilling to cash in its political capital to implement the very reforms that it once championed.

This is not unique to DAP.

It happened to MCA.

It happened to MIC.

And now DAP is facing the same pattern.

When DAP sees the sad pass that MCA and MIC are at today, it should contain its glee, and somber up to the prospect of being in their shoes at some point in the future.

It should — because it will be in their shoes at some point in the future. Just as MIC and MCA were abandoned by their electorate for being seen as meek, self-serving, and subservient, DAP will also face the same prospect. The question is not if, but when.

So how does DAP escape this dilemma?

The uncomfortable truth is: it probably can’t.

If a solution existed, MCA or MIC would have discovered it long ago. Their current political irrelevance is proof that this dilemma is structural, not personal.

For now, the only thing DAP has on its side in facing this dilemma is time. This dilemma will continue to chip away at DAP’s support among its core voters, but it will likely require take time before that erosion poses a significant problem for the party.

DAP can also try to delay the consequences. Now that DAP is in power, it can probably use its position of advantage to keep MCA and Gerakan - its main challengers - weak, so that Chinese voters have no alternative.

But even if it is very effective in ensuring that its opponents — whether MCA or Gerakan — never become strong enough to steal its supporters and followers, at some point the dilemma will outrun DAP and cause it to lose support among non-Malays, especially the Chinese electorate.

But political nature abhors a vacuum.

Where there is demand, supply will eventually emerge.

The Chinese electorate is demanding a party that speaks for them. If DAP cannot fulfil that demand—not because it does not want to, but because structural constraints prevent it—then eventually, someone else will.

Sabah may have simply offered a preview of what is to come.

Just as Sabahan voters abandoned DAP lock, stock and barrel the minute they found a party like Warisan - that they could identify with - the Chinese in Sarawak and Semenanjung will abandon it, the minute they find alternative to it too.

As a matter of fact, the Chinese in Sarawak likely have found alternatives in local parties in Sarawak, and thus are already set to abandon DAP in Sarawak as we speak.

It is only in Semenanjung that DAP can expect the Chinese electorate to stand behind it, albeit grudgingly, for the alternative to DAP has yet to emerge in Semenanjung.

As long as DAP is not able to solve this unsolvable dilemma—as long as it cannot find a way to remain in power and represent minority grievances—then the erosion of support will continue. Slowly at first. Then suddenly.

Sabah was the whisper.

In the Sarawak election next year, that whisper will likely grow louder.

And in the peninsula, it may eventually become a shout.


TheRealNehruism (nehru.sathiamoorthy@gmail.com) is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!

The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact creator@newswav.com.