When Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney took the stage at Davos 2026, he did not defend the global order. He declared it dead.
“The world order we have known for decades is gone. It’s not coming back,” he said, in one of the most direct acknowledgements yet by a Western leader that Pax Americana has fractured.
For Malaysia and ASEAN, this was not news — but it was confirmation.
The signal before the speech
Days before Davos, Carney concluded a controversial trade deal with China, cutting Canada’s 100% tariff on Chinese electric vehicles to a low single-digit rate in exchange for Chinese tariff reductions on Canadian farm exports.
Ottawa framed it as economic self-defence amid trade disruption. Critics saw appeasement. Carney called it realism.
Southeast Asia knows this dilemma well: balancing US market access, Chinese demand, and domestic industry — often under sudden tariffs, export controls, or shifting rules.
“A rupture, not a transition”
At Davos, Carney put words to what many leaders quietly accept:
“We are in the midst of a rupture, not a transition.”
The problem, he argued, is not one leader or one crisis. It is great powers weaponising economic integration — using tariffs, finance, and supply chains as tools of pressure.
For ASEAN economies embedded in global value chains, this is already a lived reality.
Why ASEAN is at the centre of this
Carney’s most important message was directed at middle powers.
“If we negotiate only bilaterally with a hegemon,” he warned, “we negotiate from weakness.”
His line that echoed across Davos was blunt:
“If you are not at the table, you are on the menu.”
This logic mirrors ASEAN centrality: imperfect, slow, but still better than facing major powers alone
Carney was effectively arguing for a larger version of ASEAN’s instinct — collective leverage over individual dependence.
Balancing Washington and Beijing
Carney never named Donald Trump, but his critique of economic bullying was widely read as a rebuke of the current US approach. At the same time, he rejected coercion by China and other powers.
This balancing act will sound familiar in Kuala Lumpur: economic engagement with China, security ties with the US, and constant effort to avoid over-dependence on either.
On security, Carney reaffirmed Canada’s unwavering commitment to NATO, signalling that economic diversification does not require abandoning defence alignments.
The takeaway for Malaysia
The standing ovation in Davos was less about Carney himself than about relief that someone had finally said the quiet part out loud.
When US tariff threats followed within hours, his thesis was tested — and reinforced.
For Malaysia and ASEAN, the lesson is simple: the era of benign globalisation is over. Pretending otherwise is not neutrality. It is a vulnerability.
In a world of rupture, middle powers either organise or get organised by others.
Ramli Amir (ramgold@gmail.com) is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!
The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact creator@newswav.com.
