-T5N-List-(Twitter)-(1).jpg)
By P Gunasegaram
With the US/Israel naked, unprovoked, bullying, rash, incendiary, heartless, cruel attack against a hapless Iran, it is more obvious than ever before that oil is rather slippery and elusive. It needs some clear thinking followed by measured action to get a grip on.
We have allowed the problem of oil to slide through our fingers because in a decades-long time of plenty we have not provided for a period when its supply is perilously threatened and prepared people to pay higher prices for a dwindling asset.
Thoughtlessly, we have followed the path of many Third World countries to squander our oil wealth through not only corrupt practices but putting political expediency above everything to neglect preserving it for future generations and making good investments through a sovereign wealth fund.
We criminally allowed the waste of precious energy by keeping prices artificially well below market prices for all Malaysians, especially for RON 95, among the lowest prices in the world at RM1.99 per litre, initially for 300 litres per month, recently reducing it to 200 litres.
This not only actively promotes the indiscriminate use of oil by our consumers, but allows it for those who could afford to pay full prices, by far the major users of RON95, inexplicably allowing richer people the leeway to use cheap oil.
No targeted subsidy
Not only was the idea of limiting the use of a precious resource and promoting alternative energy sources (who would when energy is cheap?) thrown out of the window, the idea of targeted subsidy through cash handouts was scrapped, instead implementing a system which gave the same subsidy to all Malaysians with driving licences.
With current oil prices hitting the roof, it has again raised the spectre of excessive subsidies anew, which was not extinguished before because of differential pricing within the same country and among countries. The amount of subsidy is astronomical.
One can only speculate why this Madani government is keeping a lid on oil prices when all others have allowed it to pop out from the relentless pressure caused by world prices rising. Only the foolhardy and the very rich insulated economies such as Brunei have similar or lower prices than Malaysia for RON95.
Why? Could it be that the desperate Madani government, which has been doing much to improve public ratings, is preparing to call a snap election soon, on the back of what in the future could be problematic developments on the economic and corruption front?
Is it so desperate to do well in the polls that it is postponing badly needed drastic decision-making now which will put pressure on the public but will be more prudent in the long term?
Reports put the amount of subsidies for just RON95 at about RM3 billion for March, and if prices are not adjusted, this could increase to as high as RM4 billion this month. If oil prices just stay where they are, that amounts to RM48 billion a year when the budgeted figure was more like RM700 million a month or RM8.4 billion a year, already high.
The deficit is at least RM40 billion yearly, if things keep getting worse and prices are kept unadjusted, or nearly 12 percent of the operating budget of RM338 billion this year. How and where is the government going to fill the gap? Is borrowing going to skyrocket?
Even if oil price increases fill up government coffers, should we take that route? Surely not, we should instead build up government finances for balanced development instead of frittering it away by giving the richer segments of society more money to spend.
On top of all this, although we are a net exporter of energy, we can’t be very certain of the supply of petroleum products, including diesel, because of the closure of the Straits of Hormuz through which most of our supply of heavy crude, used in our refineries, comes.
Sycophantic praise for the PM
We are very proud to proclaim that we export most of our light, expensive crude but did no one think in terms of oil security? It would have been easy to have converted our refineries to process our own “sweet” crude, instead of importing them all the way from the Middle East, and through the Hormuz Straits, to ensure uninterrupted supply.
That’s yet another indication of our shortsightedness. Instead there is sycophantic praise for the Prime Minister’s diplomatic initiatives with Iran to allow the passage of Malaysian oil through, a privilege extended to many other countries besides Malaysia.
Anwar Ibrahim is yet to tell us how long before our refineries can’t get heavy crude to refine oil, in the true Umno (Anwar seems more Umno now then PKR)/Madani style of hiding the bad news.
The other thing to remember is that our financial position would have been much better if we had simply allowed the original plan to give direct cash handouts to the poor when oil prices rose rather than give over-generously to every Malaysian who has a driving licence, 300 litres of subsidised RON95 a month.
Most of them don’t use that much. Often there are multiple driving licence holders in a household, making it more unnecessary, except to look good on paper and to the public for favourable optics, the focus of this government - mirages instead of solidity.
When the government cut the entitlement to 200 litres of RON95 a month, Anwar proudly announced that 90 per cent of them would not be affected. Why give that much in the first place then? That's a clear admission of his poor subsidy policy.
Cash handouts better
If the original plan had been put in place, then only those who needed support would have received money through direct cash handouts, not all and sundry as it is now. Former economy minister Rafizi Ramli explained it in this article: Rafizi: Govt could've handled oil shocks better if it had used Padu
He said Putrajaya could have better managed current oil price shocks if its targeted fuel subsidies had been based on the Central Database Hub (Padu), which would have identified those who were poor enough to qualify.
The government agreed in 2023 to float fuel prices and implement cash-transfer subsidies, to ensure they only reach eligible income groups.However, political considerations stymied this plan, Rafizi added.
"Because the people would have adjusted in the last three years based on their petrol consumption, and get used to the social security system, cash transfers etc. Sadly that did not happen.” Rafizi said leaders in Putrajaya were worried of backlash from the rakyat if petrol prices were floated to global market rates.
The programme was abandoned because Anwar wanted to satisfy both rich and poor and everyone in between, to curry favour with the rakyat instead of doing the necessary for good and prudent economic management, helping only those in need.
Political considerations are still trumping good decision-making. It is poignantly maddening that this remains rife, infecting our public service completely, with this Madani government impotent to plant the seeds of true change deep into the system.
(P Gunasegaram says good statesmanship requires tough decisions and a willingness to be straight with the rakyat. We badly lack both.)
P Gunasegaram (t.p.guna@gmail.com) is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!
The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact creator@newswav.com.