When Johor Menteri Besar Datuk Onn Hafiz Ghazi declared he would rather relinquish his post than share the same table with DAP, the statement landed like a stone thrown into a pond—ripples of debate spreading far beyond the state’s borders, dividing opinion sharply along familiar lines. To many, his words rang out as more than a political red line; they sounded like a racial statement, rooted in how Malaysian politics has, for decades, woven parties and race into the same fabric, much like threads in a batik design where colour and pattern are inseparable to the eye.
At the heart of the dispute lies a simple but powerful public perception: DAP is Malaysia’s most prominent multiracial party, yet in the eyes of the electorate, it is as closely identified with the Chinese community as UMNO is with the Malays. Though its membership and leadership include Malays, Indians and others, its electoral base, key representatives and historical evolution have tied it firmly to the aspirations and voices of many Chinese Malaysians. It has become, in the public mind, a vessel carrying the hopes and interests of a large community—so much so that rejecting the party feels, to many, like rejecting the passengers inside. When Onn Hafiz drew a line in the sand and said “never”, he was seen not just turning away a political rival, but closing the door on a significant segment of Johor’s society.
Critics argue that framing this purely as a matter of principle or “Johor’s way” does not hold water, pointing to what they call a clear double standard. At the federal level, his own party and the Barisan Nasional coalition sit alongside DAP in the unity government, working within the same Constitution and the same national framework. If cooperation there is acceptable, they ask, why is it forbidden at state level? It looks less like defending a sacred ideology and more like changing the rules of the game depending on where it is played. What is more, he has never spelled out exactly which policies, laws or ideological tenets he finds unacceptable—only that “they” are unacceptable. When the group you reject is defined largely by the race most associated with it, the line between political disagreement and racial exclusion blurs until it vanishes, much like a boundary marker washed away by rain.
Johor, often hailed as the land of Bangsa Johor—a slogan meant to bind all races under one identity—is a mosaic of communities. Excluding the party that speaks for so many non-Malays, critics say, is like trying to complete a puzzle while throwing away half the pieces; you end up with an incomplete picture, governing only one part of the population while leaving others on the margins. This, they argue, contradicts the very spirit of unity the Menteri Besar claims to champion.
History casts a long shadow here. For decades, the contest between UMNO and DAP has been painted as a clash between Malay nationalism and DAP's vision of future Malaysia. Over the years, DAP has been labelled “anti-Malay, anti-Islam, anti-constitution”—terms sending out signals understood only too well by those familiar with our political language. These labels are rarely rooted in detailed policy analysis; instead, they tap into old fears and loyalties, reinforcing the belief that to target the party is to target the race standing behind it. Onn Hafiz’s statement, to many, was an echo of those old tunes, familiar and divisive.
His supporters, however, see things very differently. They maintain this is strictly about ideology, not race. In their view, DAP’s core vision on Malaysia conflicts fundamentally with UMNO’s understanding of the social contract, the special position of the Malays, and the role of Islam as enshrined in the Constitution. Refusing to ally with them, they say, is no different from any political movement rejecting another party over incompatible values—a choice made on principle, not prejudice. They argue that DAP is a political entity, not a proxy for an entire community, and that opposing its ideas does not equal rejecting the people who vote for it.
At the end of the day, the reason so many hear racism in his words comes down to how our political landscape has been shaped. When you single out one party widely seen as the voice of a whole community, reject it absolutely, apply rules that differ from those at federal level, and use language that revives old divisions, your message is interpreted not as “I disagree with their policies”, but as “I will not govern together with Chinese Malaysians”. In a nation where race and politics are as intertwined as vines on a tree, words like these carry weight far beyond their literal meaning—and the debate they spark is as much about our shared history as it is about the future of Johor.
moykokming@gmail.com
Moy Kok Ming (moykokming@gmail.com) is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!
The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact creator@newswav.com.
