In Malaysian politics, few figures embody the rise-and-fall-and-rise-again cycle better than Rafizi Ramli and Hamzah Zainudin.
Both men once occupied the influential position of deputy president within their respective parties. Their departures from their former parties were marked by political disagreements and internal tensions. Now, both men are attempting to establish independent political platforms outside the shadows of their previous leadership.
Yet despite these striking similarities, political analysts argue that the two are pursuing fundamentally different missions, appealing to different voter bases, and facing vastly different political realities.
Former economy minister Dato' Seri Rafizi Ramli and former home minister Dato' Seri Hamzah Zainudin have emerged as key political actors seeking to rebuild influence after leaving the positions that once placed them at the centre of power.
Rafizi, together with Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad, has taken over the leadership of Parti Bersama Malaysia, positioning the party as a fresh reformist alternative aimed at voters frustrated with the current political establishment.
Hamzah, meanwhile, has launched the “Reset” movement, an initiative designed to consolidate conservative forces and attract voters disillusioned with the existing opposition landscape.
According to political analyst Hisommudin Bakar, both men share one important characteristic: they were once members of their parties’ elite decision-making circles.
“The deputy president's role is not merely ceremonial. Both men helped shape the direction of their respective parties and later became vocal critics of their leadership,” he observed.
While both carry similar political battle scars, their visions and methods are increasingly worlds apart.
Rafizi's Reformist Gamble
Rafizi's political approach reflects the changing nature of modern campaigning. Rather than relying solely on ceramahs, branch meetings, and traditional party structures, he has increasingly focused on digital engagement, podcasts, data-driven narratives, and issue-based politics.
Political scientist Mazlan Ali noted that Rafizi's appeal lies largely among urban youths, professionals, fence-sitters, and voters who prioritise governance, transparency, economic opportunities, technology, and future-oriented policies over party loyalty.
This strategy aligns with Rafizi's long-standing image as a reformist politician closely associated with civil society activism and institutional reform.
However, his challenge is formidable. Malaysia's political system remains heavily coalition-driven, making it difficult for any new standalone movement to gain traction without strategic alliances and a strong grassroots machinery.
Hamzah's Conservative Calculation
Hamzah's route is markedly different.
Rather than pursuing issue-driven reform politics, he appears to be focusing on organisational strength, political networks, and grassroots consolidation. His strategy is rooted in traditional political mobilisation, where influence is built through party structures, negotiations, and strategic partnerships.
Analysts suggest Hamzah's greatest opportunity may lie in strengthening ties with Parti Islam Se-Malaysia (PAS), which has emerged as the dominant force within the conservative Malay political space.
As more Bersatu grassroots leaders and division chiefs reportedly align themselves with Hamzah, he may be positioning himself as a key power broker within the opposition bloc.
Yet this path is not without risks.
Former Batu MP Tian Chua argues that Hamzah's biggest challenge is operating in a political ecosystem increasingly dominated by PAS. While his organisational network may currently appear stronger than Rafizi's, questions remain about how influence, leadership roles, and electoral seats will ultimately be distributed among competing Malay-based political forces.
The Real Test Ahead
The political futures of Rafizi and Hamzah may ultimately depend on one critical factor: whether they can transform personal popularity into sustainable political movements.
Rafizi possesses the communication skills, policy credentials, and reformist appeal to attract attention. Hamzah has organisational experience, political networks, and a stronger foothold within opposition grassroots circles.
However, Malaysian elections are rarely won by charisma alone. Political machinery, coalition partnerships, grassroots mobilisation, and strategic seat negotiations remain decisive factors.
For now, Rafizi and Hamzah stand as mirror images of each other - former deputy presidents carrying similar political scars but fighting very different battles. One seeks to reinvent reformist politics for a new generation. The other aims to reshape the conservative opposition landscape.
Whether either man can build a lasting political legacy outside the parties that once elevated them remains one of the most intriguing questions in Malaysia's evolving political story.
By: Kpost
Information Source:
Kpost (ckhorsk@gmail.com) is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!
The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact creator@newswav.com.
