The Supreme Court’s sharp observation that “RTI activism has become a new business” has turned the spotlight on public accountability and misuse of the law. The Court has denied anticipatory bail to an activist accused of obstructing a public servant involved in road construction work and hurling casteist abuse at labourers. Considering the gravity of the charges, the denial of pre-arrest bail appears legally justified. However, the general comments about RTI applicants deserve cautious reflection.
There is little doubt that some individuals misuse the Right to Information Act for the sake of personal gain. Frivolous complaints, pressure tactics and self-styled “activism” can disrupt governance and delay public projects. Yet, it would be dangerous to paint all RTI activists with the same brush. The Act, enacted in 2005, remains one of India’s most transformative democratic tools. Over the past two decades, it has exposed corruption, unearthed irregularities and empowered citizens to question authority. Many whistleblowers have faced threats, violence and social isolation.
Ironically, concerns over misuse are being raised at a time when the RTI framework itself is weakening. Several information commissions across the country suffer from vacancies and mounting backlogs, making citizens wait indefinitely for a response. Delays, administrative hurdles and attempts to dilute the law have steadily eroded its effectiveness. There is a dire need to distinguish genuine efforts initiated in public interest from coercive or unlawful conduct. Accountability mechanisms must function within the boundaries of law and civility. India’s democracy cannot afford reckless activism or opaque governance. The challenge lies in protecting both public order and the citizen’s right to know.
