Sir Keir Starmer could face a Parliamentary sleaze inquiry into claims he lied to MPs over the Peter Mandelson scandal.
The Commons will vote on Tuesday whether to refer the Prime Minister to the Privileges Committee to consider if he misled the House over the way Lord Mandelson’s appointment as ambassador to the US was handled.
Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle allowed a vote on the issue following requests from Tory leader Kemi Badenoch and other senior MPs.
Cabinet minister Emma Reynolds accused the Tories of playing “silly political games” over the issue.
But the Speaker’s decision now gives the Labour leadership a headache in deciding whether to order Sir Keir’s MPs to publicly oppose a referral to the committee.
The committee was responsible for Boris Johnson’s exit from frontline politics after it investigated him for misleading the House over the “partygate” breaches of Covid-19 laws in Downing Street.
He quit as an MP in 2023 before the committee published a report recommending his suspension.
Tory leader Mrs Badenoch called for Labour MPs to back the referral to the Privileges Committee.
She said: “The Prime Minister misled the House of Commons repeatedly.
Keir Starmer misled Parliament, sacked officials for his own failures, and risked national security with Mandelson’s appointment.
— Kemi Badenoch (@KemiBadenoch) April 27, 2026
MPs will now vote on referring him to the Privileges Committee.
The Prime Minister should be held to the same standards he held others. pic.twitter.com/KAjVQVjwHV
“He appointed a national security risk and friend of a convicted paedophile to be our ambassador in Washington, our most sensitive diplomatic post.
“He pretended that full due process was followed for this appointment. It was not.
“He has blamed the appointment on officials when the blame can only be placed at his own door.”
Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said Labour MPs must be given a free vote on Tuesday.
“Even Boris Johnson didn’t block his MPs voting for scrutiny,” he said.
“If Keir Starmer has misled the House and the public, he must be held to the same standard that we should expect of any Prime Minister.”
The Prime Minister has been accused of misleading MPs by saying that “full due process” was followed in appointing Lord Mandelson, who was given developed vetting status despite failing security checks.
The Foreign Office, under then top civil servant Sir Olly Robbins cleared him despite red flags raised by experts at the UK Security Vetting agency responsible for the checks.
Sir Keir has also faced questions for telling MPs that “no pressure existed whatsoever in relation to this case”.
Sir Olly told MPs “my office and the Foreign Secretary’s office were under constant pressure” about the appointment in January 2025, after it had been announced but before the security checks were completed.
Sir Keir told The Sunday Times he was not talking about the “everyday pressure of government” but the suggestion of specific pressure on Sir Olly to grant Lord Mandelson’s developed vetting status.
“(Sir Olly) was really clear in his mind that wasn’t pressure that was put on him. And he also goes on to say that none of this impacted his decision,” Sir Keir said.
Downing Street suggested the timing of the move was driven by next week’s elections to English councils and the Scottish and Welsh parliaments.
A No 10 spokesman said: “The Government is engaging with the two parliamentary processes that are already running on Peter Mandelson’s appointment with full transparency.
“This is a desperate political stunt by the Conservative Party the week before the May elections because they have no answers on the cost of living or the NHS. Their claims have no substance.”
The Government has promised to comply with an order by MPs to disclose documents relating to Lord Mandelson’s appointment to the Washington post, which ended after nine months in September 2025 when he was sacked over the extent of his links to paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein.
The Commons Foreign Affairs Committee is also examining how Lord Mandelson was granted security clearance.
Sir Olly, who was sacked by Sir Keir for not disclosing the security concerns to ministers, gave evidence to the committee last week.
On Tuesday the MPs are due to hear from Sir Keir’s former chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, widely regarded as a protege of Lord Mandelson.
He resigned in February over his part in the peer getting the coveted job.
The committee will also hear from Sir Olly’s predecessor, Sir Philip Barton, and receive written evidence from Foreign Office official Ian Collard, who briefed Sir Olly on the vetting findings.
Sir Olly said he was told the security experts who carried out the vetting deemed Lord Mandelson a “borderline” case and leaned towards recommending that clearance be denied, but the former Foreign Office mandarin approved his developed vetting status with mitigations put in place.
Downing Street has said the findings from UK Security Vetting, the agency which carried out the checks, were more clear-cut, describing Lord Mandelson as of “high concern” and recommending that he be denied clearance.
Read MorePolanksi says he feels ‘really sorry for the King’ over Trump visit
Local elections mapped: Where Labour is facing a ‘calamity’ and key seats to watch
Who is Morgan McSweeney? Starmer’s right-hand man and Peter Mandelson ally
When will King Charles meet Trump? Full schedule for US state visit
Future of former Maze prison site ‘very much a live issue’ – O’Neill
Masts to be removed from HMS Victory as part of £42m conservation work
