Stop Lying—Malaysia’s Racism Laws Are Useless and Everyone Knows It

image is not available — Photo Credit; Malay Mail

Racism in Malaysia is like a recurring nightmare that refuses to fade. It rears its ugly head in everyday interactions, social media debates, and, of course, politics. Every time a racial controversy explodes, the public and politicians scramble for solutions. The latest debate? Whether we need an Anti-Discrimination Act or if our existing laws are enough to curb racial discord.

Datuk Seri Aaron Ago Dagang, the National Unity Minister, has made it clear—Malaysia doesn’t need a new law to address racism. According to him, we already have a buffet of legal provisions under the Penal Code, the Sedition Act, the Communications and Multimedia Act, and the Printing Press and Publication Act. If that is true, why does racism still fester in our society like an untreated wound?

Laws on Paper, Racism in Practice

Aaron’s argument hinges on the assumption that existing laws are effective. But are they? If laws alone could erase racism, Malaysia would be a utopia of racial harmony by now. Yet, year after year, racial slurs continue to be hurled, businesses continue to discriminate, and political figures continue to weaponize race for personal gain. The minister’s logic is simple: since laws exist, they must be working. But this is a dangerously naïve perspective that ignores the reality on the ground.

Take, for example, the recent incident in Sepang where a corn seller put up a racially offensive signboard. The authorities, rather than strictly enforcing the law, resolved the matter through a simple apology session brokered by the Kawasan Rukun Tetangga (KRT). While community mediation is commendable, does it send a strong enough message? Or does it reinforce the idea that racism is a minor misstep that can be brushed aside with a half-hearted "sorry"?

Aaron later posted on X that the trader apologized and pledged not to repeat the act. The apology session was attended by representatives of the Indian community, influencers, local residents, officials from the National Unity and Integration Department, and the police. While this might seem like a resolution, it does not change the fact that such incidents keep happening. Public apologies do not dismantle systemic discrimination.

The Sedition Act: A Political Weapon, Not a Racial Shield

One of the most frequently cited laws for tackling racism is the Sedition Act 1948. But let’s be honest—this Act has historically been wielded more as a political weapon than as a genuine safeguard against racial provocation. It is conveniently used to silence dissent rather than to protect racial harmony. When a law is selectively enforced, it loses its credibility.

So, when the minister says, "We don’t need an Anti-Discrimination Act," what he really means is that the government doesn’t see a need for real, structured change. The existing laws, despite their inefficacy, provide enough political control while maintaining the illusion of legal enforcement. Why fix what works in their favor?

A Patchwork Approach to Systemic Racism

Let’s assume for a moment that Malaysia’s current legal framework can tackle racism. Even then, why are we still facing the same problems decades later? The answer is simple: laws alone don’t change mindsets. Racism in Malaysia isn’t just about individuals making offensive statements; it is embedded in hiring practices, education policies, and even government initiatives. A new Anti-Discrimination Act could offer a structured and enforceable legal framework that specifically targets these areas.

During Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s tenure, there were drafts for a Religious and Racial Hatred Act, an Equality Act, and a National Harmony Commission Act. Yet, these proposals have remained in limbo across multiple administrations. Why? Because real legal reform would disrupt the political status quo, and that is a risk few politicians are willing to take.

Fear of Change, Fear of Accountability

Aaron’s statement that "if the situation is pressing, the ministry would fully support a new law" is nothing more than a well-crafted way of saying, "We’ll talk about it, but we won’t act on it." What defines a "pressing situation"? Racial tensions have been a persistent issue for decades—so how much more "pressing" does it need to get before real change happens?

Malaysia cannot afford to take a wait-and-see approach to racism. The longer we pretend that existing laws are sufficient, the more we enable discrimination to thrive under the guise of legal protection. An Anti-Discrimination Act would not be a magical solution, but it would at least signal a commitment to real, enforceable change rather than hollow statements of unity.

Stop Making Excuses!

It is time to stop using the "existing laws are enough" excuse. The fact that racism still dominates headlines proves that these laws are either ineffective or unenforced. If Malaysia is serious about curbing racism, we need new, targeted legislation that does not just exist on paper but is actively and fairly enforced.

Until then, racism will continue to be a problem that we address in Parliament with empty words while ignoring its real impact on the people. The government needs to decide: does it want to protect its political convenience, or does it want to take real steps toward unity? Because right now, the answer is painfully obvious.

References:

Shamini Daniel is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!

The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact Newswav.