-T5N-List-(Twitter)-(1).jpg)
By P Gunasegaram
Few annals in development keep on returning to haunt the living than the legacy and legend of the Battersea Power Station project, an iconic London landmark on the banks of the Thames that sucked in some of Malaysia’s premier funds and land companies.
The latest in that tragic tale is that the CEO of developer Battersea Power Station Development Company or BPSDC, who has been fired, has alleged that it was done because the company had effectively overstated the value of its assets by a “few hundred million pounds”.
It should be noted that in 2013 when the project was announced, it was supposed to have been finished by last year. Looks like it's still alive and kicking - hard.
That should set sirens screaming louder than Anwar Ibrahim’s motorcade in Malaysia because not only is Battersea a major problem child, delivered by Malaysia’s property icon and SP Setia founder Liew Kee Sin no less, it involves big names in fund management and property.
The entire development was worth a whopping RM53 billion over a decade ago and probably costs a lot more now. And, it is owned by three icons - that word again - from Malaysia, prominent developers SP Setia and Sime Darby Property (SDP) with a 40 per cent stake each and the venerable Employees Provident Fund or EPF, which controls over a trillion ringgit in funds, with the remaining 20 per cent.
Big names
To top it up, major stakes in SP Setia and SDP are owned by another venerable fund, national unit trust operator Permodalan Nasional Bhd or PNB, with nearly RM350 billion in assets, which owns some 49 per cent of SP Setia and some 45-47 per cent of SDP according to recent reports.
Other significant shareholders in SP Setia were EPF with 11 per cent and pension fund KWAP with nine per cent. EPF owned over 15 per cent in SDP while KWAP owned nearly eight per cent.
The Battersea project dates back to 2013 when it was launched with much fanfare in London, the opening graced by no less than British Prime Minister then, David Cameron, and London mayor and subsequently British prime minister Boris Johnson who were feted by Liew, who was soon after embroiled in a massive conflict of interests.
This conflict and the potential loss to Battersea shareholders were explained in this column titled Sime Darby, SP Setia, EPF lose billions from Liew’s Battersea ‘legacy’ which was written in August 2024.
Essentially, I explained that the EPF, SDP and SP Setia are likely to shoulder losses of some RM250 million a quarter or RM1 billion a year from a 5-year rental guarantee at Battersea.
The guarantees, reportedly for a period of five years, were given by the Battersea Power Station redevelopment project in London to buyers to encourage sales but the company was saddled with a huge payment for income not met by purchasers.
It turns out the guarantee may have been given to a holding company owned 65 per cent by EPF and 35 per cent by PNB which bought the commercial development of Battersea for 1.58 billion pound sterling, a whopping RM8.8 billion at the time of the deal in 2018. The rest, mainly residential, remained with the development company.
All in the family
Now, reflect on that. The Battersea development company, BPSDC owned 20 per cent by EPF and 40 per cent each by two companies substantially owned by PNB with significant stakes held by EPF and KWAP, gave rental guarantees to a company owned by EPF and PNB.
How much more than “all in the family” can you get? The potential losses are being hidden through a maze of interlocking shareholders. Malaysians do not know the full extent of the losses for entering this risky, expensive project developing a white elephant landmark in faraway London.
But to say that all this could not have been seen earlier is not right. KINIBIZ highlighted major problems way back in 2015, over a decade ago through a series of articles titled “Is Battersea losing power?”
The synopsis said then : “The market slows while its charismatic chairman Liew Kee Sin leaves to become a direct competitor in earnest. Can the project sustain its momentum to the projected end in 2025?”
Well, 2025 has come and gone and Battersea is still struggling. Battersea’s penchant for big names was not humbled by these things, but continued unabated. A new chief executive, Donagh O’Sullivan was appointed in June 2024.
King Charles’ visit
In Dec 2024, he showed King Charles around the development, along with an anchor tenant for the commercial part, Tim Cook, CEO of Apple. But in May 2025, barely six months later, O’ Sullivan was dismissed.
The Financial Times reported earlier this month that he alleged he was dismissed because he flagged that properties owned by the Battersea development company were overvalued by a few hundred million pounds. The case is now before a London tribunal for wrongful dismissal.
The development company denied the allegations, saying in a statement: “Battersea Project Holding Company appointed highly regarded forensic accountants to independently investigate historic claims.
“Whilst the two forensic accountants’ reports deal with confidential matters, the conclusion reached was that Mr O’Sullivan’s concerns were not borne out, no further investigation was warranted and accounting practices employed by Battersea Project Holding Company Limited adhere to international accounting standards.
“Its accounts have always been audited and signed off by PwC, one of the big four accounting firms.”
The company declined further comment: “Adhering to the confidential nature of Employment Tribunal procedures, we cannot comment on this matter further at this time.”
The FT reported that in its statement of defence to the tribunal the company denied any accounting irregularities and said it had dismissed O’Sullivan over poor performance, a lack of strategic leadership and allegations of misconduct.
Quality of assets is a rather subjective matter and different people have different things to say about it. But one must ask why a career professional who has a long and distinguished career in other places will make such serious allegations against Battersea if it is not warranted.
Forensic audit needed
Considering Battersea’s checkered past and the incestuous holdings referred to earlier, this can only be unravelled by a simultaneous total forensic audit of all of these Government Linked Investment Companies, EPF, PNB and KWAP and Government Linked Companies, SP Setia and SDP, and their roles.
One of the key parts of that investigation should be to find out how a person who was not even a representative of any of the controlling shareholders managed to originate this in the first place, putting at stake eventually the monies of three of our largest funds and two of our biggest property companies.
If such an audit is not done and released to the public, expect the ghost of Battersea to revisit periodically as other skeletons in the cupboard tumble out from time-to-time.
(P Gunasegaram says when an albatross remains on the neck for too long, questions need to be asked and answers given. Otherwise, agony is needlessly prolonged.)
P Gunasegaram (t.p.guna@gmail.com) is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!
The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact creator@newswav.com.