.jpg)
By Mihar Dias April 2026
Very often, losing one’s teeth is treated as part of aging, like wrinkles, rheumatism, and unsolicited advice from younger people. You turned sixty, somebody handed you dentures and soft porridge, and society nodded solemnly as if biology had spoken.
Now the Ministry of Health tells us it is targeting more than 50 per cent of senior citizens to retain at least 20 natural teeth by 2030. https://newswav.com/A2604_0QGauQ?s=A_9VdDPhh&language=en
Admirable. But one is tempted to ask — only 20?
Twenty sounds less like an aspiration than a negotiated surrender.
Why should keeping most of one’s natural teeth into one’s eighties be considered exceptional? Why has the bar been set somewhere between “can still chew” and “not entirely edentulous”?
If one can keep a heart going with medication, knees going with titanium, and politicians going far beyond their expiry date, why should teeth be the first to be retired?
There is something faintly absurd in treating dental survival as a public miracle.
The cynic might say we have normalised decline and then turned modest resistance to it into policy ambition.
Consider the statistics: only 34.3 per cent of seniors have at least 20 natural teeth. That is not merely a dental number; it is a social commentary. It whispers of decades when oral health was treated as cosmetic rather than foundational. We lecture children to brush twice daily, then somehow expect adults to arrive at seventy with a mouthful of consequences.
And yet we speak of “healthy aging.”
Healthy aging without teeth is a curious proposition. Try nutrition without chewing. Try dignity when eating in public becomes negotiation. Try explaining why oral health is separate from general health when gum disease has known links to systemic illness.
The minister is right: the mouth is the gateway to the body. https://newswav.com/A2604_0QGauQ?s=A_9VdDPhh&language=en
But perhaps we have been treating the gateway like a neglected back entrance.
There is also a cultural resignation at work. Many seniors seem to wear tooth loss as an inevitable badge of old age.
Why?
One suspects generations were taught that dentures are destiny.
But must they be?
At 79, if one still has most of one’s natural teeth — and some do — it proves something inconvenient: decline is often less inevitable than advertised.
Perhaps the more radical target should be this: why not expect Malaysians to keep nearly all their natural teeth into their eighties?
Why shouldn’t eighty-year-olds be biting into apples instead of discussing adhesive creams?
Why is that utopian?
Maybe because prevention is less dramatic than rescue.
There is always funding for dentures, campaigns for dentures, even 3D-printed dentures now — progress arriving elegantly after neglect has already done its work.
But where was the revolution in prevention decades earlier?
One cannot help smiling at the bureaucratic poetry of a “6020 Campaign,” which essentially says: reach 60, keep 20 teeth.
A slogan of managed attrition.
Why not 6028?
Or, better still, 8080 — eighty years, eighty percent of your own teeth.
Now there is a campaign.
Of course outreach to rural communities matters. Dentures matter. Access matters. All commendable.
But perhaps the bigger reform is philosophical.
Stop treating old age as a slow surrender.
Including dental surrender.
Because every retained tooth is not merely enamel.
It is function.
It is nutrition.
It is self-respect.
It is proof that aging need not always be framed as a catalogue of losses.
And perhaps senior citizens themselves should become less apologetic.
Those who have kept their teeth into their late seventies and beyond should not be viewed as lucky anomalies.
They should be treated as evidence.
Evidence that the standard has been set far too low.
Maybe the real scandal is not that many elders have too few teeth.
It is that society has been persuaded this is normal.
We have been lowering expectations one molar at a time.
A civilization that can put men in orbit, print dentures in 3D and debate longevity to 100 should surely manage to keep grandparents chewing properly.
Anything less feels toothless in every sense.
Mihar Dias (mihardias@gmail.com) is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!
The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact creator@newswav.com.