President Donald Trump called on Congress to enact legislation that would end birthright citizenship, continuing the fight against the enshrined right after the Supreme Court ruled against him Tuesday.
“The Supreme Court upheld Birthright Citizenship, which is too bad for our Country, but we can easily make it up in Congress through Legislation, with the support of the President, that has now been determined during this process. No long and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment is necessary!” Trump wrote on Truth Social.
In one of the most anticipated rulings of the term, the justices struck down the president’s executive order that sought to end birthright citizenship for children born to undocumented immigrants or people in the U.S. temporarily.
Trump’s pushback comes ahead of the July 4 weekend, when he is expected to headline a fireworks show in celebration of America’s 250th anniversary with a speech in the nation’s capital.
Over the last few months, critics have accused Trump of taking over the semiquincentennial events to celebrate himself or his administration’s policies.
Key Points
- Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship
- The court has a history of siding with Trump in other immigration cases
- Trump calls on Congress to end birthright citizenship, despite Supreme Court ruling
- Supreme Court allows states to ban trans athletes from competing on teams
- Supreme Court sides with Republicans, strikes down campaign spending limits
Trump offers snarkiest response ever to birthright citizenship loss: ‘I would like to congratulate President Xi’
23:00 , Alex WoodwardDonald Trump has spent years railing at the Constitution’s principle of birthright citizenship and has sought to unilaterally redefine who gets to be an American.
But after the Supreme Court struck down his unconstitutional executive order to block automatic citizenship to the children of certain immigrant parents, the president seemed to believe he still has a shot in Congress — and then he thanked China’s president.
“I would like to congratulate President Xi, and the Great Country of China, on their massive Birthright Citizenship WIN!” Trump wrote on Truth Social Tuesday.
Trump and administration officials have repeatedly claimed that thousands of pregnant women travel to the U.S. within the final days of their pregnancy every year to ensure their newborn child gets American citizenship, including potentially tens of thousands of Chinese nationals. There is little proof that the claim is true.
Clarence Thomas claims Supreme Court birthright decision ‘devalues’ US citizenship for other Americans
22:30 , Alex WoodwardConservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas claims the landmark ruling affirming citizenship for all children born on U.S. soil “devalues” American citizenship.
In a separate dissent from the majority opinion, Justice Samuel Alito suggested that the majority’s opinion will “degrade” the concept of American citizenship by making the children of “birth tourists” citizens.
Read more from Alex Woodward:
Clarence Thomas claims birthright decision ‘devalues’ citizenship for other Americans
Sandy Hook shooting survivor warns loosening gun laws will lead to more gun deaths
22:00 , Ariana BaioA survivor of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting cautioned the Supreme Court that loosening state bans on assault-style rifles could lead to more gun deaths.
“Far too many school shootings, including the tragedy that took place at Sandy Hook, are made more deadly by the easy availability of assault weapons,” Abbey Clements said Tuesday.
Clements’ comment comes after the Supreme Court said it would take up two cases challenging state laws that ban assault-style semiautomatic weapons.
“The simple fact is that we had fewer mass shootings and mass shootings were less deadly when we had a federal assault weapons ban in place. With the Supreme Court opening the door to striking down more state bans, we know what the result will be – more mass shootings and more gun deaths.”
Ruling on transgender athletes applies to states with laws banning participation
21:53 , Ariana BaioThe Supreme Court’s ruling on transgender women and girls participating in sports is limited to states that currently have laws restricting them from playing on women’s and girls’ teams.
The court’s ruling Tuesday does not prohibit transgender women and girls from participating on sports teams, rather, it gives states the OK to enact bans.
Approximately 29 states have such laws.
From the Supreme Court on Monday: Mail-in ballot voting
21:30 , Ariana BaioMonday, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of states that enacted laws to allow for late mail-in ballots to be counted after Election Day – so long as they are postmarked by Election Day.
The ruling was a loss for Trump, who has railed against mail-in ballot voting.
Supreme Court delivers big blow to Trump’s plan to limit mail-in voting
‘Our relief feels temporary’ Immigration advocacy group says
20:50 , Ariana BaioEven though the Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, the National Immigration Project said the relief feels “tempered and temporary” as the court allows the Trump administration to implement other restrictive policies.
"Since the Supreme Court took this case, we have been holding our breath – today, we exhale, but our relief feels tempered and temporary,” Sirine Shebaya, the executive director of the National Immigration Project, said.
“This executive order was never really about citizenship policy. It was about power—about testing whether a president can simply declare a constitutional provision means something other than what it says, and dare the courts to stop him. Today they did. But this should have been the easiest case the Court heard all year. The fact that this was a fight at all should trouble us as much as the outcome relieves us.’
Shebaya pointed to dissents from four justices who argued they should have allowed President Donald Trump to restrict birthright citizenship via an executive order. She also pointed to other decisions this week that allowed the administration to revoke Temporary Protected Status from Haitians and Syrians as well as a decision that allows the administration to implement a turn-back policy at the US border.
“We are watching this country move, decision by decision, toward becoming an authoritarian, white supremacist autocracy. Today’s decision lets us hold on to increasingly slippery hope that we are not there yet.”
Riley Gains calls Supreme Court transgender athlete ruling ‘a victory’
20:18 , Ariana BaioRiley Gaines, a conservative activist who became outspoken against transgender women and girls competing in sports, called the Supreme Court’s decision a “a victory.”
Gaines made headlines in 2022 when she tied with Lia Thomas, a transgender woman, for fifth place in their collegiate swimming competition. She became an advocate for banning transgender women and girls from competing on women’s and girls’ sports teams, leading the “Save Women’s Sports” movement.
“The law of the land now reflects reality and common sense,” Gaines wrote on X. “Insane that this requires celebrating, but it’s a victory nonetheless.”
Trump trolls birthright citizenship decision by congratulating China
19:50 , Ariana BaioIn the wake of the Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship ruling, the president congratulated the Chinese President Xi Jinping and China on its “WIN” – trolling the court’s decision.
“I would like to congratulate President Xi, and the Great Country of China, on their massive Birthright Citizenship WIN!” Trump wrote on Truth Social Tuesday.
'We’re right and he’s wrong' lawmaker says of birthright citizenship ruling
19:34 , Ariana BaioRep. Adriano Espaillat, a former undocumented immigrant who now chairs the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, applauded the Supreme Court’s ruling on birthright citizenship – declaring that Trump was wrong to try to get rid of it.
“Trump tried to erase one of our nation’s clearest constitutional guarantees, and he failed. We won, and he failed. We’re right, and he’s wrong,” Espaillat said.
“We will not be held to a different standard. That our children who were born here are U.S. born children, irregardless of our status and that we belong and we deserve to have all the rights and privileges extended to all Americans by the U.S. Constitution.”
What the Supreme Court ruling on campaign spending means
19:09 , Ariana BaioThe Supreme Court lifted restrictions on how much a national political party can spend in coordination with an individual candidate for advertising or other expenses.
In a 6-3 decision, the conservative majority of the court said the spending cap violated the First Amendment – based on the interpretation that political spending is a form of speech.
Political parties were previously restricted on how much they could spend in coordination with a campaign; the limit varied based on House and Senate elections.
But Republican committees, joined by then-Senator JD Vance, argued the cap on spending violated a 2001 Supreme Court ruling, Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. FEC.
Watch: Mike Johnson learns SCOTUS denied Trump efforts to end birthright citizenship
18:54 , Ariana Baio'The Constitution barely survived today' Gavin Newsom says
18:20 , Ariana BaioThe Constitution barely survived today.
— Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) June 30, 2026
By a 5-4 vote, Trump’s Supreme Court declined to let him rewrite the Constitution and end birthright citizenship.
We’re hanging on by a thread. The fight to defend our democracy is far from over.
Justice Kavanaugh argues Congress can define who is a citizen
18:18 , Ariana BaioConservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh argued in his dissent to the birthright citizenship ruling that Congress could redefine who a U.S. citizen is, thus bypassing the declaration made in the Supreme Court’s ruling Tuesday.
Kavanaugh said while he does not think Trump’s executive order conflicts with the Constitution, he does believe it conflicts with a federal law that defines who a U.S. citizen is
“Congress could – consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment– amend [the law] or otherwise enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country,” Kavanaugh said.
After the ruling was issued, Trump demanded that Congress begin work to end birthright citizenship for all.
What did the justices who dissented on birthright citizenship say?
18:04 , Ariana BaioJustices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh dissented from the majority opinion in the birthright citizenship case,
Thomas argued that the Citizenship Clause of the Constitution was meant only to grant citizenship to Black Americans domiciled in the United States, but who had been denied citizenship in Dred Scott v. Stanford.
He said it was not meant to extend to temporary visitors or undocumented immigrants.
“The Court adds to the sad history of the Fourteenth Amendment, which was designed and understood to secure equal rights for the freed blacks but has instead been repurposed for political projects that the Reconstruction Congress did not support,” Thomas wrote.
In a separate dissent, Alito argued the Court should have used the ruling to rein in illegal immigration.
“We should not adopt an erroneous interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment simply out of fear of the consequences of “rocking the boat” or as a reaction to current immigration policy,” Alito wrote.
In another dissent, Gorusch argued the court should have ruled narrowly, allowing some of Trump’s executive order to apply to the children of foreigners who are in the U.S. temporarily.
Mike Johnson’s eye roll says it all as reporters break the birthright citizenship ruling to House Speaker
17:45 , Eric GarciaHouse Speaker Mike Johnson rolled his eyes and shook his head momentarily as reporters broke the news to him on Tuesday that the Supreme Court had upheld birthright citizenship, striking down President Donald Trump’s executive order.
Johnson was in the middle of giving his weekly press conference while answering a question about the previous two High Court rulings and talking prospectively about birthright citizenship when the ruling was announced, going against Trump.
Read more from Eric Garcia:
Mike Johnson eye roll says it all as reporters break birthright citizenship decision
Trump calls on Congress to end birthright citizenship, despite Supreme Court ruling
17:41 , Ariana BaioAfter suffering a massive loss at the Supreme Court, the president called on Congress to end birthright citizenship through legislation – despite the court’s ruling affirming that the Constitution gives citizenship to anyone born in the U.S.
”The Supreme Court upheld Birthright Citizenship, which is too bad for our Country, but we can easily make it up in Congress through Legislation, with the support of the President, that has now been determined during this process,” Trump wrote on Truth Social Tuesday.
The court’s ruling firmly declared that “children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause.”
However, Trump insisted, “No long and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment is necessary!”
“Congress should start TODAY to work on ending expensive and unfair to our Country, Birthright Citizenship. They will have my Complete and Total Support!”
'Trump suffered a stunning loss' ACLU says
17:30 , Ariana Baio“With a 6-3 judgment from the U.S. Supreme Court, President Trump suffered a stunning loss on a signature order he signed on day one of his presidency,” Anthony Romero, the executive director of the ACLU, said.
“This was one of the most important constitutional cases of the past 100 years. The president bet his legacy trying to secure this policy win — even attending the argument in person — and he lost. It was especially gratifying that the majority opinion was authored by Chief Justice Roberts, and that Trump appointees Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett agreed with the decision to strike down the order.”
Supreme Court will consider challenge to law banning semi-automatic rifles next term
17:27 , Ariana BaioNext term, the Supreme Court justices will hear two gun-related cases, this time concerning bans on semi-automatic-style rifles such as AR-15s.
The cases, stemming from challenges to laws in Illinois and Connecticut, argue that banning assault-style rifles infringes on the Second Amendment.
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis calls birthright citizenship ‘major defeat’
16:48 , Ariana BaioRepublican Governor Ron DeSantis, who has closely aligned his policies with Trump, said Tuesday that the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold birthright citizenship was “a major defeat.”
The Florida governor lamented that the decision was “substantive,” rather than “procedural” – meaning it is a firm decision that would require much more to overrule.
“Will need either a constitutional amendment or a future court to overrule this,” DeSantis said Tuesday.
Jewish Council for Public Affairs welcomes birthright citizenship ruling
16:45 , Ariana Baio“As a community that found refuge in this country as immigrants, Jews know that the promise of belonging — the principle that if you are born here, you are from here — is a constitutional bedrock that has allowed our community, and so many others, to thrive in safety for generations,” Amy Spitalnick the CEO of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs said in a statement.
“As this administration continues to target immigrants and refugees with dehumanizing and draconian policies and bigotry, we will keep fighting to ensure that every human life is treated with dignity and that this country lives up to its highest ideals."
In Photos: Activists celebrate Supreme Court ruling on transgender athletes
16:31 , Ariana Baio
Attorneys for transgender athletes call ruling ‘deeply harmful’
16:26 , Ariana BaioLawyers representing transgender athletes, who fought state laws barring their clients from participating on school sports teams, called the Supreme Court’s ruling “deeply harmful” and “heartbreaking.”
“This ruling is deeply harmful for transgender women and girls who only asked for the ability to participate in sports with their peers,” Sasha Buchert, the Senior Attorney and Director of the Non-Binary and Transgender Rights Project, for Lambda Legal said.
Burchert said, “Countless studies have demonstrated the myriad benefits that come with participation in team sports. Now, one population, transgender youth and collegians, are targeted for specific and baseless discrimination.”
“This is a heartbreaking ruling for our clients and transgender girls like them who’ve asked for nothing more than the same opportunities afforded to their peers.” said Joshua Block, Senior Counsel for the ACLU’s LGBTQ & HIV Rights Project.
“It is profoundly unfair to deny a young person the benefits of teamwork and dedication because of who they are,” said Kelly O’Neill, Legal Voice’s Idaho attorney. “We should be removing barriers for girls and women in sports, not creating new ones.”
News outlet retracts report about Supreme Court justice retiring
16:19 , Alex WoodwardNPR has retracted an apparently erroneous report that a sitting Supreme Court justice has retired, shortly after the final decision of this year’s term.
A public information officer for the court has stressed that no such announcements have been made. An editor’s note on the story now states that the outlet “erroneously published” the report.
Trump celebrates ruling expanding political campaign spending ruling
16:07 , Ariana BaioPresident Donald Trump celebrated the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down campaign spending limits for political parties in coordination with individual campaigns.
“The Supreme Court just took restrictions off political spending! A BIG WIN FOR REPUBLICANS and, more importantly, The First Amendment!” Trump wrote.
Immigration advocacy group applauds birthright citizenship ruling
15:55 , Ariana Baio“This is an historic victory for immigrant families, constitutional rights, and the principle that every child born in this country belongs in this country,” We Are CASA, a Latino immigrant advocacy group said Tuesdsay.
“The Trump administration’s attempt to deny citizenship to United States-born children, threaten generations of children with legal uncertainty, and overturn more than a century of settled constitutional law has failed.”
“The Supreme Court has reaffirmed what generations of children and families have known to be true: citizenship is a constitutional guarantee. No President has the authority to unilaterally rewrite the Constitution or decide which babies count as citizens and which do not.”
Trump celebrates Supreme Court transgender ruling: 'BIG WIN'
15:52 , Ariana BaioOn Truth Social, President Donald Trump celebrated the Supreme Court’s ruling upholding state laws barring transgender athletes from participating in sports.
“BIG WIN: The United States Supreme Court just RULED AGAINST MEN PLAYING IN WOMEN’S SPORTS. Wow! That takes that ridiculous situation off the table!!!” Trump wrote.
Chief Justice says Trump's executive order did not align with 14th Amendment
15:47 , Alex WoodwardIn the court’s opinion, Chief Justice Roberts wrote there is “scant evidence” for the Trump administration’s “dramatically revisionist view” of the 14th Amendment and limits on citizenship at birth.
“In any case, postenactment history cannot override the text,” Roberts wrote.
“If Congress intended to limit American citizenship to the children of those domiciled in the United States, nothing in the succinct language of the Citizenship Clause conveyed that design.”
The words used throughout Trump’s order — “mother,” “father,” “lawful,” “temporary” — are absent from the 14th Amendment, Roberts notes.
“For a simple reason: they did not matter,” he wrote
Trevor Project condemns transgender athlete ban
15:45 , Ariana BaioThe Trevor Project, a nonprofit that focuses on suicide prevention in the LGBTQ+ community, condemned the Supreme Court’s decision to allow schools to ban transgender athletes from participation.
“The continued attacks on transgender young people in this country must stop. Today’s news has nothing to do with safety or fairness in sports; these rulings only serve to send a message to transgender and nonbinary young people that says, ‘you don’t belong,’” Jaymes Black, the Trevor Project CEO said in a statement.
“Thoughtful discussion about rules and regulations is one thing, but banning an entire demographic of young people from all participation whatsoever is unacceptable. These blanket bans lack balance, impacting all transgender youth regardless of age, sport, or level of competition. It is beyond frustrating to see so much time, effort, and energy poured into policies that do not make environments safer for young people, but rather, have been proven to cause serious harm.”
Black encouraged anyone who needs support to reach out to The Trevor Project’s counselors here.
Trump loses on birthright citizenship after Supreme Court strikes down sweeping attempt to rewrite Constitution
15:40 , Alex WoodwardThe Supreme Court has struck down Donald Trump’s attempt to block automatic birthright citizenship to newborns in the U.S., dealing a massive blow to the president’s anti-immigration efforts and his spurious attempt to rewrite the Constitution.
The 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”
Read more:
Trump loses on birthright citizenship after Supreme Court strikes down order
States can ban transgender athletes from women’s teams, Supreme Court rules
15:40 , Brendan RasciusThe Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that states may bar transgender student-athletes from competing in female sports, issuing the long-awaited decision on the final day of its term.
Read more:
Supreme Court upholds state laws restricting transgender student athletes
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship
15:36 , Ariana BaioThe Supreme Court has upheld the right of birthright citizenship in the United States, striking down President Donald Trump’s executive order that sought to remove the right for children born to undocumented immigrants or people in the US temporarily.
Justice Kagan says ruling is 'for' those who think there is too much campaign finance law
15:34 , Ariana Baio“Today’s decision thus can join the parade of those recently overruling established law because of a new majority’s new outlook on a consequential matter,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote in her dissenting opinion.
“Here, the subject is campaign finance law. For those who think there is too much of it in this country—for those who would prefer even more money to be pumped even more easily into politics despite the danger of corruption—thisoverruling is for you.”
Supreme Court sides with Republicans, strikes down campaign spending limits
15:29 , Ariana BaioIn a win for Republicans, the Supreme Court has struck down a federal law that limited how much political parties could spend in coordination with individual campaigns.
With just months until the midterm elections, the Supreme Court has once again expanded the opportunity for political parties to spend large amounts in coordination with candidates
The court ruled that the law limiting spending in coordination with campaigns violated the First Amendment
Justice Clarence Thomas rejects rights for trans people
15:20 , Ariana BaioIn a concurring opinion, in which no other justice joined, Justice Clarence Thomas rejected the idea that transgender people are deserving of “immutable characteristics.”
“Men and boys with gender dysphoria are not women or girls, even if they believe that they are,” Thomas wrote.
“Sex is an immutable ‘biological’ characteristic, it is binary;and ‘man’ and ‘woman,’ ‘boy’ and ‘girl,’ are the terms thatcorrespond to adults and children of each sex. To use language to obscure reality—to show ‘indifference regarding the truth’ –is to lie to the public and cease to treat our fellow citizens ‘as equals.’”
Justice Sotomayor reads from her dissent
15:15 , Ariana BaioLiberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor is reading from her dissent in West Virginia v. BPJ , the case that allows schools to prohibit trans women and girls from competing on sports team that align with their gender.
“The ban is absolute, so B. P. J. cannot practice on girls’ teams, even if she would not take anyone’s spot in an eventual competition, even if everyone who tries out for the team makes it, and even if having the chance to participate could aid immensely in treating B. P. J.’s gender dysphoria,” Sotomayor wrote.
“Sports, of course, are often zero sum, but the law need not and should not be. Because the Court today errs by reducing the burden, at least in the sports context, that the Constitutionplaces on state actors when classifying based on sex, I respectfully dissent.”
Kavanaugh says eligibility is based on 'biological sex'
15:09 , Ariana BaioIn the majority opinion, authored by Kavanaugh, the conservative justices said states may determine who is eligible to compete on women’ and girls’ sports teams.
“In other words, may schools determine eligibility for women’s and girls’ sports based on biological sex? The answer is yes,” Kavanaugh wrote.
Chief Justice John Roberts, Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett joined him in the majority.
Supreme Court upholds state law barring trans athletes from competing
15:05 , Ariana BaioIn a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court upheld state laws that ban transgender women and girls from competing on women's and girls’ sports teams.
Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh said the state laws, from Idaho and West Virginia, were consistent with Title IX’s definition of women and girls.
Title IX is the federal law that prohibits discrimination based on sex in educational programs.
Opinions to be released shortly
15:00 , Ariana BaioIt’s 10:00 a.m., which means the court will begin releasing the final decisions of the term.
Ruling expected on GOP-backed challenge to limits on campaign spending
14:42 , Brendan RasciusOn Tuesday, the high court is also expected to issue a ruling in a less high-profile case: a GOP-backed challenge to federal limits on campaign spending.
Vice President JD Vance and other Republicans challenged the limits on spending between candidates and political parties, which were upheld by a lower court.
The key question is whether current limits on party spending violate the First Amendment.
The ruling will likely have implications for this November’s midterm elections.
Reporters and spectators gather outside the Supreme Court
14:33 , Brendan RasciusAhead of the justices’ long-awaited rulings, news reporters and spectators were seen gathering outside the court on Tuesday morning. The rulings are expected to be handed down at 10 a.m.
The court has a history of siding with Trump in other immigration cases
14:28 , ReutersThe court's conservative majority has backed Trump on other major immigration-related policies since he returned to the presidency.
For instance, the court on June 25 cleared the way for the Trump administration to strip hundreds of thousands of Haitian and Syrian immigrants of a humanitarian status that protects them from deportation. On the same day, it sided with him by backing the U.S. government's authority to turn away asylum seekers when officials deem U.S.-Mexico border crossings too overburdened to handle additional claims.
In other cases, it let Trump expand mass deportation measures on an interim basis while legal challenges play out, such as ending humanitarian protections for certain migrants, deporting people to countries where they have no ties and carrying out aggressive immigration raids that can target individuals based on their race or language.
The court, however, has not always ruled in Trump's favor. In February, it struck down sweeping tariffs he pursued under a law meant for use in national emergencies. And on Monday it refused to let him fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook.
What to know about the long-awaited birthright citizenship ruling
14:26 , ReutersHere’s what to know about the court’s expected ruling on birthright citizenship:
A lower court previously blocked Trump's executive order directing U.S. agencies not to recognize the citizenship of children born in the United States if neither parent is an American citizen or legal permanent resident, also called a "green card" holder.
Challengers to Trump's order argued that it violates language in the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment that confers citizenship to those born in the United States who are "subject to the jurisdiction thereof."
Trump issued the order last year on his first day back in office as part of a suite of policies to crack down on legal and illegal immigration. Critics have accused the Republican president of racial and religious discrimination in his approach to immigration.
Ahead of the ruling, some experts had estimated that Trump's directive could affect the legal status of as many as 250,000 babies born each year.
The Supreme Court is set to deliver series of long-awaited rulings today
14:22 , Brendan RasciusThe Supreme Court is poised to issue a series of high-profile decisions Tuesday, the last day of its term.
At 10 a.m., the justices are expected to deliver a long-awaited decision on the legality of President Donald Trump’s executive order last year seeking to end birthright citizenship, a right enshrined in the 14th Amendment.
The court will also rule on whether bans in West Virginia and Idaho preventing transgender athletes from competing in women’s school sports are constitutional.
