The judge should neither be pro government nor anti government. He (or she) must be pro justice.
Tun Suffian Mohamed Hashim,
Former Lord President of the Federal Court
We had the best of times and the worse of times. But for the man on the street, the courts provided a forum where all were equal before the law.
Malaysia this week bid farewell not only to a towering judicial figure but, some would argue, to the very idea of an independent judiciary as it was once envisioned. The retirement of Chief Justice Tun Maimun Tuan Mat marks the end of a brief yet resolute era—an era in which the judiciary dared to stand tall, even as the political winds howled against it.
Appointed as Malaysia’s first female Chief Justice in 2019, Tun Maimun’s tenure will be remembered for courage, clarity, and a refusal to bend to populist pressure or political intimidation. Her judgments were not merely legal pronouncements; they were moral testaments. She presided over cases that many others would have conveniently recused themselves from. She was at the helm when the Federal Court upheld the conviction of former Prime Minister Najib Razak, who was found guilty in the 1MDB-linked SRC International corruption case. That singular moment—a five-member bench affirming that no man, not even a former premier, was above the law—was a rare display of institutional backbone.
For Malaysians who had grown weary of elite impunity, it was a breath of fresh, judicial air. For the powers that be, it was a thunderclap—a warning that the judiciary might just be serious this time.
But Tun Maimun’s departure has resurrected anxieties that many had tried to suppress. Who will fill her shoes? Will her successor share her judicial independence, or will they be chosen precisely because they won’t? Will we look back on her tenure as a brief golden age, quickly swallowed by the swamp?
Fragile Justice
Judiciaries in any democracy operate within an ecosystem. When that ecosystem is healthy—with a free press, an empowered civil society, and honest law enforcement—judges have space to deliver just rulings. But when those support systems are weak, and when the executive looms large, even the strongest judges can be rendered ornamental. In recent months, hints of creeping interference have begun to surface again—transfers, delays, quiet pressure, strategic appointments. The timing of Tun Maimun’s exit, coinciding with high-stakes trials and shifting political alliances, has understandably raised eyebrows.
To eulogize Tun Maimun’s judicial career is also to confront a deeper truth: justice in Malaysia remains fragile. It depends too often on individuals rather than institutions. When one judge stands firm, we breathe a sigh of relief. When that judge retires, we hold our breath again. This cycle cannot go on forever. A system that relies on one incorruptible person at a time is no system at all—it is a lottery.
Tun Maimun’s own rise was not inevitable. She was nearly bypassed in favour of male colleagues with more political appeal. Her appointment, when it came, surprised many. Yet, in the end, it reaffirmed the age-old lesson that talent, when unshackled, can rewrite the rules. She leaves the bench not as a mere footnote, but as a towering figure who reminded Malaysians what justice can look like.
Law is not poetry
Still, even she would likely caution against romanticism. The law is not poetry. It is structure. It is precedent. It is systems. And systems can corrode when not maintained. Her farewell should not be taken as the closing chapter, but rather the turning point. Civil society must now demand more transparency in judicial appointments. The Malaysian Bar must grow teeth. The media must shine brighter lights in darker corners. And ordinary citizens must stop believing that justice is someone else’s job.
Tun Maimun once said in a speech that a judge’s loyalty is not to kings or politicians, but to the Constitution and the people. That is a line worth engraving somewhere permanent.
As she exits the bench with her trademark grace and restraint, Malaysia is left to answer a simple question: Will we build on her legacy—or simply remember it fondly while justice, once again, slips away?
In bidding farewell to Tun Maimun, we are not just seeing off a judge. We are confronting the fragility of our institutions, the resilience of our ideals, and the battle between justice as aspiration and justice as reality.
And that farewell, if we’re not careful, could become permanent.
Dr. D. Ananda (david5299@gmail.com) is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!
The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact creator@newswav.com.
