PENAMPANG: Huguan Siou (Kadazandusun Murut paramount leader) Tan Sri Joseph Pairin Kitingan said it is important to carefully examine the Constitution’s “ingredients” when considering leadership appointments.
“When we read our Constitution, there are specific ingredients that must be carefully considered. These are the open ingredients that cannot be overlooked,” he said, responding to media queries about suggestions for him to become the next Sabah Head of State.
“There are people who support, people who oppose and people with mixed feelings. That is the nature of humans,” he said.
Tun Juhar Mahiruddin is the current and 10th Yang di-Pertua Negeri of Sabah, who has held the post since Jan 1, 2011.
SPONSORED CONTENT Shell Sabah Deepwater Production Manager Earns Unsung Hero Award Kota Kinabalu: Sabah Deepwater Production Manager at Sabah Shell Petroleum Company Limited (SSPC), Musti Juin from Kuala Penyu was recently awarded the 2024 PETRONAS Malaysia Upstream Unsung Hero Award in recognition for his strategic leadership and exceptional Health, Safety, Security and Environment (HSSE) performance. Read more There have been speculations about potential successors, including Tan Sri Musa Aman, Tan Sri Pandikar Amin Mulia and Tan Sri Joseph Pairin Kitingan.
Pairin said it is important to look beyond personal ambitions and take constitutional considerations into account.
“When we examine our Constitution, there are open ingredients to consider. If something is not explicitly stated or is conditional and not visible in the Constitution, how do we account for the feelings and justice we must consider.
“Indeed, if they point out our shortcomings, that is their prerogative,” he said.
He pointed out the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) which has been a point of contention for over six decades.
“The interpretation of the MA63 does not show certain key elements and where we are heading.
“Take for example Malaysia’s formation. Initially, it included Singapore, Sabah, Sarawak and Malaya. Brunei was once part of the discussion but chose not to join. So it was four entities.
“Singapore’s inclusion is fundamental to Malaysia’s definition. If Singapore is removed, how can we still call it Malaysia? Thus, this matter requires a truly sincere discussion.
“The MA63 has been disputed for six decades and remains unimplemented. The current Prime Minister suggests we should just implement what was originally agreed upon.
“Everything is now confused. We are talking about 40 per cent (revenue sharing). According to the Constitution, we should receive 40 per cent of revenue collections annually. It should be straightforward.
“But after 60 years, this has not been fulfilled, which is why people are upset. The 40 per cent of agreed debts remain unpaid. Many agreements are unfulfilled. How can we be content when there is uncertainty in our negotiations?
“This is about culture and future. As an older person, I may not have much time left, but the young generation must think deeply. They have a future at stake.
“I am grateful to still be alive to speak about this. But the young generation must think seriously. Do not deceive yourselves.
“As rational human beings, we can distinguish right from wrong. Do not claim something is right when it is not. Do not deny pain when you are suffering.
“If you deceive yourself, who will face trouble in the future? We all will. The young generation must think with sincerity and honesty. Do not abandon the defence of your State and your own future,” he said.