Recently, unlike a political party who argues for the merits to bring back GST, instead of a hybrid as announced by PMX, a former politician in a podcast interview said that PMX’s conceptual announcements, lacking immediate structural details, give the impression that the administration does not fully grasp the operational complexities of taxation and it signals a lack of readiness or understanding.
When PMX introduced the concept, he explicitly stated that the government would retain the SST framework but look at combining certain efficient features of the GST—all while strictly promising not to burden the lower-income population.
However, because he did not immediately present a blueprint explaining how these two clashing systems would mesh, the former politician asserted that the idea was conceptually flawed and showed an incomplete understanding of tax logistics.
During the 1998 Asian Financial Crisis, when PM4 famously rejected the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and slapped sweeping controls on foreign capital on September 1, 1998, prominent economists, Western policymakers, and financial institutions fiercely condemned the move.
Many argued that a leader with no formal training in monetary economics was acting on dangerous nationalistic impulse rather than sound financial logic.
These same people labeled PM4’s approach as completely reckless, a disaster waiting to happen, it would choke off foreign direct investment (FDI) and create a destructive black market for the Ringgit.
They argued that PM4 does not understand that markets were simply penalizing weak macroeconomic management.
As what happened thereafter, what began as absolute condemnation eventually shifted into a highly studied case of economic success.
PM4 may lack financial knowledge but the policy's outcome clearly showed that a leader does not need to be a monetary scientist if they possess the executive courage to break from failing orthodoxies and the wisdom to execute blueprints designed by capable technocrats.
A pure technocrat or standard economist would likely have never implemented capital controls because it violated every rule in the global financial textbook at the time.
PM4's lack of orthodox economic indoctrination gave him the audacity to defy global markets when the stakes were highest.
In the hybrid GST SST issue that PMX announced, which matters more?
A leader with broad political vision or technical micro-design?
A leader that defined the political boundaries and social objectives?
History always shows that pure technical knowledge without political leadership often fails.
The executive driver is more important at the inception of a policy to break through bureaucratic inertia and set a clear national direction.
The micro-designer becomes indispensable during the implementation stage.
And that falls on the shoulders of the FM2, the Treasury civil servants, and the Royal Malaysian Customs Department.
Their job is to figure out the complex logistics—such as avoiding cascading taxes, managing input-tax credit mechanisms, and ensuring compliance.
FLK (leekhean.foo@gmail.com) is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!
The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact creator@newswav.com.