.jpg)
By Mihar Dias September 2026
There are some subjects politicians should approach with the delicacy of a man carrying a cup of hot coffee through a room full of sleeping cats.
Religion is one of them.
The recent UMNO General Assembly provided another reminder of this rather obvious rule.
Sepang UMNO chief Datuk Noorazli Said reportedly told a joke involving a Catholic priest, a nun and a reference to Psalm 129. https://newswav.com/A2609_ZEC5jo?s=A_jk6zM1A&language=en
The joke drew criticism, particularly from Sabah leaders Datuk Arthur Kurup and Datuk Wilfred Madius Tangau, who described the remarks as inappropriate and offensive and called for an apology. https://newswav.com/A2609_ZEC5jo?s=A_jk6zM1A&language=en
Noorazli has since explained that his intention was not to insult Christianity or Christians. He said the story was merely an analogy intended to illustrate focus, perseverance and wisdom in achieving one's goals. He also acknowledged that references involving religious figures can be interpreted differently, particularly in a multi-religious country, and said he was prepared to apologise if anyone was offended. https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2026/09/14/umno-division-leader-prepared-to-apologise-over-lewd-joke
That response is important.
Because there are really two different questions here.
What did he intend? And what did people hear?
They are not necessarily the same thing.
A speaker may intend humour and produce offence. A politician may intend an analogy and accidentally step on a theological landmine.
And once the landmine explodes, explaining that one was merely walking through the field does not make the explosion disappear.
There is also the curious matter of Psalm 129.
The joke reportedly attributed the punchline to Psalm 129, although the purported passage does not appear there. That may have been intended as part of the humour, but it adds another layer of awkwardness to an already sensitive story.
The criticism from Kurup is therefore understandable. His reminder that political differences do not give anyone a licence to make light of another person's religion is a principle worth defending.
His reference to the 3Rs — race, religion and royalty — is equally pertinent.
Malaysia has spent decades learning, sometimes painfully, that words have consequences.
We are a country in which a mosque may stand not far from a church, a temple or a gurdwara. We celebrate Hari Raya, Chinese New Year, Deepavali, Christmas and Wesak. We have learned to live with differences because we have little choice.
But living together requires something more than constitutional guarantees.
It requires restraint.
And politicians, particularly those speaking from the stage of a major national party, have a special responsibility because their jokes do not remain inside the hall.
They acquire a life of their own on Facebook, TikTok, WhatsApp and news portals.
A joke told to 6,000 delegates can become a national controversy before the speaker has finished his nasi lemak.
Yet there is another side to this episode which should not be ignored.
We should also resist the Malaysian tendency to turn every offensive remark into evidence that an entire political party, race or religion has suddenly become the enemy.
That would be equally irresponsible.
Noorazli has explained his intention and indicated that he is prepared to apologise. If an apology is made, it should be accepted in the spirit in which it is offered.
An apology should not become another political weapon.
Nor should criticism be dismissed as political correctness.
Both sides have a point.
The speaker has the right to explain what he meant.
Those offended have the right to say how it was received.
And somewhere between intention and impact lies the maturity that Malaysian politics desperately needs.
Perhaps the real lesson from this episode is not that politicians should stop making jokes.
Politics without humour would be unbearable.
The lesson is that not every joke belongs on every stage.
A politician speaking at a private dinner among friends may get away with humour that would be wholly inappropriate at a national political assembly. Context matters. Audience matters. Subject matter matters.
And religion matters.
There is nothing particularly courageous about making a joke about another person's sacred beliefs.
The real test of political maturity is knowing when not to make it.
UMNO, like every other major political organisation in Malaysia, speaks frequently about unity.
But unity cannot simply be a word printed on banners and repeated in speeches.
It has to be practised when the microphone is switched on.
It means defending one's own faith without humiliating somebody else's.
It means being able to disagree without ridicule.
And perhaps most importantly, it means knowing how to say "I got it wrong" without believing that an apology is a defeat.
Noorazli now has an opportunity to do precisely that.
If he apologises sincerely, the matter should be allowed to end there.
Malaysia has far bigger problems to solve.
The country does not need another religious quarrel manufactured from a joke.
We already have enough serious problems.
We don't need to invent more — especially from the Bible, the Quran, the temple, the church or the mosque.
There are plenty of politicians' speeches available for satire.
Religion should probably be left out of the comedy routine.
Mihar Dias (mihardias@gmail.com) is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!
The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact creator@newswav.com.
