Ever had a shop or brand refuse to honour a warranty over some tiny clause buried in the fine print, then act like there was nothing more to discuss? You are far from alone, and in Malaysia, that kind of rejection is often on shakier legal ground than the seller wants you to believe.
A complaint filed with the National Consumer Complaints Centre described a business that simply ghosted a customer's warranty claim, ignoring messages and stalling until the warranty period quietly ran out, leaving the consumer with no repair, no refund, and a warranty that turned out to be worthless in practice. Despite the existence of the Consumer Protection Act 1999, disclaimers like "no warranty, no return" are still treated by many retailers as standard practice, even though such blanket disclaimers may not actually hold up if challenged.
The law itself is fairly clear on this point. Under Section 38 of the Consumer Protection Act, an express guarantee given by a manufacturer is legally binding, and no supplier or manufacturer is allowed to simply contract out of the Act by hiding a clause in the fine print. If a company tries to use a hidden clause to dodge a legitimate claim, that itself can constitute an offence under the Act, regardless of what the fine print says.
The practical route for consumers who feel wronged is the Tribunal for Consumer Claims, which handles claims up to RM50,000 with a flat RM5 filing fee and does not allow lawyers to represent either side, keeping the process relatively accessible. The catch is that the tribunal is under-resourced and can be slow, and many consumers simply do not know it exists or assume the fight is not worth the hassle.
My Opinion
This is exactly the kind of thing that quietly costs regular people money because most of us just accept "sorry, warranty voided" as the final word instead of pushing back. I have definitely done this myself, grumbled about a rejected claim and then just moved on rather than filing anything. Knowing there is an actual tribunal built for exactly this situation, with a five ringgit filing fee, changes the calculation. If the amount is meaningful to you, it is worth the paperwork.
Ronny M (ronny76netstuff@gmail.com) is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!
The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact creator@newswav.com.
