The world has moved on, but justice has not. As Malaysia marks 16 years since Teoh Beng Hock’s death and watches Indira Gandhi still separated from her daughter, this column argues that delay is not failure it is a choice.
Time is supposed to heal. That is the lie we repeat when justice does not arrive.
Sixteen years. 5,840 days. That is how long Teoh Beng Hock has been gone. Not missing. Not forgotten. Gone. And yet, for his family, time has not moved forward it has only stretched.
The world has changed since 2009. Governments have risen and fallen. Technology has leapt ahead. Phones have become smarter. Data has become sharper. Truth, we are told, is now easier to uncover.
But for this case, time has stood still.
The Human Cost: When Absence Ages
In sixteen years, a life should have unfolded.
There should have been a wedding photograph yellowing gently with age. A child learning to walk. Birthdays counted not by grief, but by candles. A career shaped by experience, mistakes, growth. Parents growing older while watching a son become a man.
Instead, there is an absence that has matured.
The absence has learned how to sit at the dinner table. How to remain silent during festivals. How to occupy anniversaries that no longer feel ceremonial, only heavy. The absence has learned patience because it has been forced to.
This is the cost that never appears in official statements.
We speak about investigations. The family lives with waiting.
Waiting is not passive. Waiting is labour. Waiting is waking up every day knowing the truth exists somewhere, but remains out of reach. Waiting is watching time move forward for everyone else while being anchored permanently to a single date.
Every year since then, the world marks progress. The family marks endurance.
And Teoh Beng Hock’s family is not alone in this suspended time.
In a different corner of the nation, the promise of justice has quietly failed. Indira Gandhi, the mother at the centre of Malaysia’s most harrowing child-custody case, lives within an equally unforgiving calendar of loss. Years have passed since the courts affirmed her rights and delivered judgments in her favour. On paper, the law was decisive. In reality, the system has not delivered. Her daughter has still not come home.
For Indira Gandhi, time is measured not in anniversaries, but in missed school years, unseen kilometres, and a childhood unfolding somewhere beyond her reach. Like Teoh’s family, she wakes each day knowing the law is on her side, yet the system has failed to deliver what it promised.
One family waits for accountability for a life lost. Another waits for enforcement so a life can be restored. Different wounds, same cruelty of delay.
The Systemic Failure: Time as a Choice
Sixteen years is not a delay.
It is a decision.
This case is often described as “complex,” “sensitive,” or “old.” These words soften what is, in reality, a continuous institutional choice to postpone accountability. A cold case suggests abandonment. This was not abandoned.
It was managed.
Managed through inquests. Managed through statements. Managed through apologies without consequences. Managed through the quiet belief that time itself would resolve what the system would not.
But in 2025, there is no credible excuse for stagnation.
Forensic science has advanced. Digital reconstruction is precise. Data analysis is faster and deeper than it was in 2009. Institutions today routinely solve crimes older than this case using tools that did not exist sixteen years ago.
The issue is not capability.
It is will.
Each year without resolution is not an accident. It is the cumulative result of decisions to delay, to defer, to declare closure without answers. What has been stolen is not merely justice, but closure, something no apology can replace.
Closure is not emotional comfort. It is a public obligation.
When a person dies in state custody, the burden of explanation belongs entirely to the state. Not partially. Not symbolically. Entirely.
Sixteen years later, that burden remains unpaid.
Silence as Policy
Silence does not always arrive suddenly. Sometimes it settles in layers.
First, outrage fades.
Then attention shifts.
Then responsibility disperses.
Finally, silence becomes policy not written, not announced, but practiced.
Different leaders have held office since 2009. Different promises have been made. Yet the outcome has remained the same: no decisive accountability that matches the gravity of the loss.
This is not a failure of one administration. It is a failure of institutional memory and moral urgency.
Public frustration has now reached a point where symbolic gestures are no longer read as empathy, but as substitution. Apologies, deep bows, and anniversary statements may acknowledge pain, but they do not answer the central question: what has materially changed? For many Malaysians, the concern is no longer whether institutions can act, but whether they choose not to. Calls for transparency such as the release of full investigation papers are driven by a simple logic: if there is nothing to hide, there should be nothing to withhold. Over time, silence begins to look less like caution and more like policy. When accountability is repeatedly deferred, the public inevitably concludes that fatigue itself has become a strategy waiting out families, waiting out outrage, waiting out memory.
Time has been allowed to do the work that institutions refused to complete.
Turning to Geneva: When Domestic Doors Close
With domestic avenues exhausted, Teoh Beng Hock’s family has now turned to the international human rights system in Geneva. This is not a criminal court, and it does not promise punishment. But it does something Malaysia has failed to do for sixteen years: it refuses silence. By bringing the case before United Nations human rights mechanisms, the family is placing an unresolved custodial death under global scrutiny where explanations are demanded, not deferred, and where silence itself becomes part of the record.
Going to Geneva is not an act of desperation. It is an act of escalation. It signals that when justice stalls at home, it must be examined under international norms of accountability and human rights. It preserves the truth in history, even when domestic systems attempt to close the file.
The Debt We Owe
Justice is not charity.
It is not goodwill.
It is not compensation.
Justice is a debt the state owes its citizens especially when power, custody, and authority are involved. And like all debts, it accumulates interest when unpaid.
After 5,840 days, the interest is unbearable.
The longer justice is delayed, the more damage it does not just to one family, but to public trust. Every unresolved custodial death quietly teaches citizens that accountability is negotiable, that time can dilute truth, that endurance is mistaken for consent.
It is not.
The family’s refusal to accept symbolic closure is not defiance. It is a refusal to allow time to be weaponised against truth.
A Moral Emergency
Sixteen years is long enough.
The 17th year must not begin in silence.
This moment demands more than remembrance. It demands action. At minimum, it requires a full public accounting of what has been done, what has not, and why. It requires transparency that can be examined, questioned, and challenged. It requires institutions to acknowledge that unresolved justice is not neutral it is harmful.
This is a moral emergency, not a historical footnote.
The community cannot outsource conscience entirely to institutions. Civil society, professionals, and ordinary citizens have a role to ask, to insist, to refuse forgetting. Memory is not passive. Memory is pressure.
If justice is a debt, then it is already overdue.
And every day that passes without action adds another day to a ledger the nation will eventually have to answer for.
Time has been given.
Enough.
Annan Vaithegi, writes what some fear to whisper.
This op-ed builds on “Remembering Teoh Beng Hock: From Political Aide to Symbol of Justice Denied”, DAP Leaders and the Legacy of Teoh Beng Hock: From Protest to Power and “We Don’t Want Compensation We Want Accountability”: Teoh Beng Hock’s Family Stands Firm, 16 Years On, continuing the reflection on how the death of a young man evolved into a national reckoning over truth, power, and conscience. It also turns to another unfinished wound A Mother’s Endless Night: Indira Gandhi and the Anatomy of a National Wound where a mother’s grief exposes the deep fractures of justice, faith, and state authority.
Annan Vaithegi (annanvaithegi@icloud.com) is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!
The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact creator@newswav.com.