
Carlos Alcaraz continues to build on his reputation as a positive influence for the younger generation.
Currently the world number one, Alcaraz is playing his first clay-court tournament of the year in Monte Carlo.
He opened his campaign with a comfortable 6-1, 6-3 win over Argentina’s Sebastian Baez.
Alcaraz was asked about player privacy, which has become a talking point due to increased TV camera access in areas previously considered off-limits. His comments reflect the maturity that has made him so popular with fans around the world.
Carlos Alcaraz makes valid point about player privacy

“For the fans, it’s great,” Alcaraz said during his pre-tournament press conference. “They love seeing what goes on behind the scenes, what we do, what the facilities inside the tournaments look like.”
“But for the players, it’s a bit strange because we don’t really have anywhere to relax anymore. We’re constantly thinking there are cameras and that everyone is watching us.”
“Having cameras so close, able to see what we’re watching on our phones—I think that’s too much.”
“We already don’t have much privacy in tournaments, and I think this is too much. We should have spaces where we can be alone without being filmed.”
The world number one recognises how valuable this sort of access can be. Fans enjoy seeing what life is like for players behind the curtain – it helps bring supporters closer to those they follow.
The increasing lack of privacy for athletes is something governing bodies should address. The gap between private and public life keeps shrinking in today’s digital world.
Tennis could use someone speaking up about it. And with his growing influence in the sport, Alcaraz might be just the person to get people paying attention.
Gauff raises player privacy issue
Alcaraz’s comments came after similar concerns were raised by Coco Gauff earlier in the year at the Australian Open.
After her quarter-final defeat to Elina Svitolina, Gauff was filmed smashing her racket in one of the corridors under Rod Laver Arena, sparking further conversation about where the line should be drawn between access and privacy.
The footage sparked a backlash from fans and pundits. Brad Gilbert came to her defence, as did Alexandra Eala.
“I tried to go somewhere where they wouldn’t broadcast it, but obviously they did,” Gauff said afterwards.
“So maybe some conversations can be had because I feel like at this tournament the only private place we have is the locker room.”
Gauff’s frustration was valid. Television cameras simply do not need to be present in the hallways of a major stadium for tennis fans to enjoy a broadcaster’s content.
The broadcast didn’t add anything meaningful to the coverage. There are plenty of ways to entertain tennis fans – filming a player when at their most vulnerable is not one of them.
Read more:
