VAR - Video Assistant Referee.
It's engineered for perfection, delivered in broadcast delays.
It's a binary tool in a sport ruled by nuance and it's forever re-litigated in the court of public opinion;
Like in group chat meltdowns where it'll be littered with words like "LiVARpool", "VARsenal" or "VARchester United".
VAR was supposed to fix football's greatest injustice:
The bad decision. The ghost goal. The offside toe.
The dive that won a derby.
Instead, we get bad decisions in slow motion, from five angles, with a semi-transparent line drawn by a guy named Steve in a room that's not even in the same postcode as the stadium.
Other sports made peace with tech:
In cricket, you get to walk off with dignity after making wrong review claims.
In tennis, Hawk-Eye ends the debate.
In rugby, the ref explains the call, and it's done.
Football?
Well football casually said: "Just trust the process."
Then spent six years hiding the instruction manual.
That's a bold ask in a game where:
- A single goal can swing a season.
- "Clear and obvious" is neither clear nor obvious.
- Grown men would still argue over what constitutes a "phase of play."
Here's the thing, though:
Football tried to dress itself up with tech, but forgot it was wearing muddy boots.
You can't automate heart-stopping chaos, but you can surely learn to live with it.
Because football isn't broken.
It's just built differently. It's continuous, with fewer natural breaks.
And VAR interruptions feel awkward - like pausing a guitar solo to consult a spreadsheet.
The rhythm suffers. The drama deflates.
It's low-scoring, with a razor-thin margin for error.
One decision, be it right or wrong can tilt a match, a season, a legacy.
That's why every call feels heavier in football than in any other sport.
And unlike rugby or cricket, football only recently discovered the microphone.
Yes, referees now explain some VAR decisions over the stadium PA.
But after three minutes of confusion, hearing "the decision is..." doesn't always explain why the decision is actually what it is.
The problem was never just transparency.
It's interpretation.
Because no announcement on Earth can stop fans arguing over:
- Was there enough contact?
- Did he gain an advantage?
- What even is an "unnatural arm position"?
It's not just the mistakes.
It's the uncertainty that surrounds them.
VAR isn't worse because it's flawed tech.
It's worse because football is uniquely difficult to officiate.
The game flows too fast.
The rules live in grey areas.
The stakes sit on a knife's edge.
Football is too impulsive. Too irrational. Too soaked in what-ifs.
You can't retrofit silicon into a game made of sweat, split-seconds, and shouting.
Until VAR gets smarter, or football gets slower…
we're stuck with this glitchy referee's sidekick capable of fixing injustice.
But yet capable as well of becoming the villain… just like some club owners.
So what next then?
Give us the audio.
Give us the video.
Give us a 200-page VAR handbook.
We'll still spend Monday morning arguing about whether it was hand-to-ball or ball-to-hand.
Or don't...
Because we'll probably reach Mars before we all can agree what an "unnatural arm position" means anyway.
Share your passion for football through #GilaBola and stand a chance to win cash prizes worth up to RM1,200!
Find out how to join here. Don't miss out! T&Cs apply.
The Accidental Adult (izwan.alias@yahoo.com) is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!
The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact creator@newswav.com.
