The ongoing constitutional showdown in Negeri Sembilan where the Federal Court is set to determine if the Yang di-Pertuan Besar can unilaterally sack Executive Council (Exco) members carries deep echoes of Malaysia's landmark constitutional struggles over royal versus executive power.
The crux of the Negeri Sembilan crisis hinges on the interpretation of the phrase "holds office at the Ruler's pleasure".
The Yang di Pertuan Besar contends that because the 10 Exco members broke their oath of allegiance by supporting a rival proclamation to remove the ruling monarch, the ruler exercised an inherent royal prerogative to revoke their appointments.
The former Excos and the Menteri Besar argue that under a constitutional monarchy, the phrase "at the ruler's pleasure" must be read in tandem with provisions requiring the monarch to act solely on the advice of the executive (the Menteri Besar).
If the Federal Court ultimately rules in favor of the Excos, it will firmly establish that state monarchs cannot dismiss government officials without formal executive advice.
This would legally restrict rulers from intervening in the composition of an active state government, effectively consolidating absolute administrative control under the executive branch.
Go back to 1983 and 1993, known commonly as the constitutional crises
During that era, Tun Dr Mahathir who was the Prime Minister then sought to amend the Federal Constitution to remove the requirement of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong’s assent for bills to become law, ensuring the executive/parliament could override a royal pocket-veto.
Additional amendments in 1993 removed the Malay Rulers of their legal immunity, subjecting them to a Special Court.
Just asTun Dr Mahathir's amendments sought to codify that the monarch must strictly follow executive will without arbitrary refusal, a pro-executive ruling by the Federal Court in the application by the Mentri Besar and the former excos in Negeri Sembilan would structurally achieve the same outcome for state-level administrations.
Move forward to 2008.
In that year, known publicly as the Terengganu Menteri Besar impasse, the Sultan of Terengganu successfully asserted his discretion over the executive following the 2008 general election.
The federal government under UMNO/Barisan Nasional insisted on reappointing Datuk Seri Idris Jusoh as Menteri Besar.
The Sultan of Terengganu refused to accept the government's nominee, choosing instead to appoint Datuk Seri Ahmad Said.
Despite initial threats of a constitutional crisis and pushback from federal leadership, the executive ultimately blinked, capitulating to the Sultan's choice.
This dynamic repeated itself in Perlis in 2008 and Selangor in 2014, showing that while the written spirit of the constitution leans toward a rubber-stamp monarchy, the practical power dynamics frequently allow a determined palace to successfully push back against executive dictates.
The upcoming Federal Court ruling on the Negeri Sembilan issue on 16 Dec 2026 will decide whether these residual royal conventions remain legally valid or are definitively written out of Malaysian law.
FLK (leekhean.foo@gmail.com) is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!
The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact creator@newswav.com.