.png)
POLITICAL parties rarely collapse overnight.
More often, they fade gradually as voters, supporters and even their own members begin questioning their purpose.
That is the challenge confronting Bersatu after its setbacks in Johor and Negeri Sembilan. The issue is not simply electoral defeat. It is the growing perception that Bersatu is struggling to define its place in a political landscape increasingly dominated by Umno and PAS.
When Bersatu was founded in 2016, its mission was clear. It offered Malay voters an alternative to Umno and became the vehicle through which disillusioned Umno leaders challenged the party they once served.
Nearly a decade later, that distinction has become harder to see.
Why should a Malay voter choose Bersatu over Umno? Why should an opposition supporter choose Bersatu over PAS?
These are questions the party has yet to answer convincingly.
The rise of PAS has fundamentally changed the dynamics within the opposition. In many constituencies, PAS now possesses the stronger grassroots machinery, the more loyal support base and the clearer ideological identity. Bersatu may still provide national leadership, but increasingly it risks being overshadowed by its larger ally.
That reality poses an existential challenge.
A political party can survive electoral setbacks. What it cannot survive is becoming politically redundant.
The problem is compounded by Bersatu's continued dependence on Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin. There is no question that Muhyiddin remains the party's greatest asset. He is its founder, its most recognisable leader and the figure most capable of holding the party together.
Yet that dependence has also become a vulnerability.
Nearly 10 years after its formation, Bersatu still struggles to showcase a new generation of leaders capable of carrying the party forward.
As a result, every electoral setback becomes a judgment not only on the party but also on Muhyiddin himself.
Supporters point to remarks by Azmin Ali that Bersatu is prepared to work with smaller parties to broaden its political reach.
Coalition-building is a legitimate political strategy. But alliances cannot compensate for the absence of a clear identity.
The issue facing Bersatu is not a shortage of partners. It is a shortage of reasons for voters to choose it.
Political parties survive because they command constituencies that others want access to. Umno retains influence because of its deep grassroots network. PAS remains formidable because of its disciplined support base and ideological clarity.
Bersatu must ask itself what unique constituency it represents today.
Working with smaller parties may create headlines and improve electoral arithmetic in selected seats. But it does not solve the party's core problem. Smaller parties generally gravitate towards strength; they rarely rescue parties perceived to be in decline.
The comparison with Umno is instructive.
Following its historic defeat in 2018, many predicted Umno's demise. Yet it survived because it possessed deep organisational roots, an extensive branch network and leaders embedded within local communities.
Bersatu does not enjoy the same advantages. Its organisational structure remains relatively young, making electoral defeats more damaging and recovery more difficult.
None of this, however, means Bersatu is finished.
Malaysian politics has repeatedly shown that parties written off can recover. But recovery requires more than alliances and political manoeuvring. It requires reinvention.
Bersatu must decide what it wants to be in the years ahead: a permanent junior partner to PAS, a replacement for Umno, or a party with a distinct political identity of its own.
At present, it appears caught between all three.
That is why questions about the party's future continue to grow louder after every electoral setback.
The problem is not that Bersatu has already sunk. The problem is that too many people are beginning to wonder whether it still knows where it is heading.
Until Bersatu can answer that question, every new alliance will look less like a strategy for growth and more like an attempt to postpone a reckoning.
