Man gets seven years, caning for cannabis possession

11 Jun 2026 • 9:18 PM MYT
The Sun Daily
The Sun Daily

For the latest news and features from Malaysia and the rest of the world.

Image from: Man gets seven years, caning for cannabis possession

A man was sentenced to seven years in prison and 10 strokes of the cane after pleading guilty to possessing 311.1 g of cannabis at a hotel in Bukit Bintang.

KUALA LUMPUR: A man was sentenced to seven years in prison and 10 strokes of the cane by the High Court here today after pleading guilty to possessing 311.1 g of cannabis at a hotel in Bukit Bintang last March.

Judge Datuk Aslam Zainuddin handed down the sentence against Sali Sangsangan, 39, after he pleaded guilty to a reduced charge offered to him, and ordered the accused to serve his prison sentence from the date of his arrest on March 17, 2025.

Under the alternative charge, the man was accused of possessing 311.1 g of cannabis at a hotel in Bukit Bintang here at 1.20 am on March 17, 2025.

The alternative charge was under Section 6 of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, which provides for life imprisonment or a minimum of five years in prison and a minimum of 10 strokes of the cane upon conviction.

Earlier, deputy public prosecutor Faridah Nurdinie Bahrum informed the court that the accused’s representation to reduce the charge had been accepted by the Attorney General’s Chambers.

“The representation has been accepted, and an alternative charge under Section 6 of the Dangerous Drugs Act, punishable under Section 39A(2) of the same Act, has been offered should the accused wish to plead guilty,” she said.

The accused’s lawyer, M. Manoharan, appealed for a lighter sentence on the grounds that his client had cooperated fully throughout the investigation, adding that any sentence imposed should take a rehabilitative approach rather than purely punitive measures.

“My client regrets what happened. Spending over a year in prison has made him realise his mistake. He has repented and is remorseful for his actions,” said the lawyer, who also informed the court that his client had previously been charged under Section 39B of the DDA for drug trafficking.

Faridah Nurdinie, however, called for the maximum sentence, arguing that public interest must take precedence over the accused’s personal circumstances, and that drug offences are serious crimes.

“I urge the court to consider that when an offence involves drugs, the offender should not be given a lenient sentence. I also ask the court to consider that the weight of drugs in this case is substantial, five times the statutory possession limit,” she said.