.jpg)
By Mihar Dias March 2026
Imagine a scene straight out of a 1970s theatre of the absurd in Long Island, New York. You walk into a neighbourhood pizza parlour with a man everyone respectfully calls “Godfather.” The mood is casual, the mozzarella is melting nicely — and before the cannoli arrives, you realise you’ve somehow left the table with fewer working body parts than when you sat down.
That, in simple terms, is what Malaysian politics increasingly feels like today.
You enter expecting dinner and conversation. You leave wondering who at the same table quietly arranged for the damage.
Which brings us to the latest episode featuring Rafizi Ramli, the former economy minister and PKR strategist who now sounds less like a policy wonk and more like a character in a political detective drama. Following the alleged syringe attack on his son and a threatening message sent to his wife, Rafizi has floated what Malaysians instinctively assume whenever something strange happens in politics: it may have been an inside job.https://luminews.my/news/4046894
Not outsiders.
Not rival parties.
Not shadowy political enemies lurking in dark corridors.
No — someone from within.
In the Madani era, even paranoia seems to have been institutionalised.
For decades, Malaysians were conditioned to believe political danger always came from “the other side” — opposition plots, foreign interference, anonymous cyber armies, or faceless conspirators scheming in smoky rooms.
But today, the more fashionable threat appears to come from inside the house: factional rivalry, internal cannibalism, and ideological trench warfare disguised as reformist passion.
Politics, in short, has evolved from a battlefield into a family feud.
As with most family feuds, the deepest bitterness rarely comes from enemies — it comes from relatives who know exactly where to strike.
Rafizi’s remark that only people close to him would know his family routines is less shocking than revealing. https://luminews.my/news/4046894
It reflects a political culture where trust has become so scarce that allies are treated as provisional friends — colleagues in daylight, suspects after sunset.
Of course, this is hardly new in Malaysian politics. Parties have long behaved less like ideological organisations and more like sprawling extended families, complete with jealous cousins, ambitious uncles, and quiet heirs waiting patiently for their turn to inherit power.
What is new is how openly this reality is now acknowledged.
When a senior leader publicly hints that the threat may come from within his own party, it signals more than personal anxiety. It reveals a political ecosystem where internal rivalry has grown so intense that suspicion now outweighs solidarity.
Madani politics, at least in theory, promised a new maturity — governance anchored in reform, accountability, and ethical leadership. Instead, it increasingly resembles a reality TV competition where contestants smile together on stage while plotting each other’s elimination backstage.
It is not that Malaysian politics has suddenly become more vicious. It is simply that it has become more honest about how vicious it already is.
Ironically, parties built on reformist ideals often suffer the fiercest internal battles. When the unifying ideology is “change,” everyone believes they hold the purest version of it — and therefore sees internal rivals not merely as competitors, but as traitors to the mission.
This dynamic is particularly visible within Parti Keadilan Rakyat, a movement forged in opposition struggle that now faces the awkward realities of governing. Reformist parties usually find unity easier when fighting a common external enemy than when managing competing ambitions inside government.
Once power is attained, incentives inevitably shift. Loyalty becomes negotiable. Ideals grow flexible. Allies become temporary.
This is the central paradox of Madani politics.
It promises moral renewal while operating within a deeply transactional political culture. It speaks of unity while breeding hyper-competition among insiders. It preaches trust while normalising suspicion.
The result is a strange psychological environment where political leaders must constantly watch their backs — not for enemies across the aisle, but for colleagues sitting beside them.
Some may argue that Rafizi’s remarks reflect personal frustration rather than systemic decay. Yet public reaction tells a different story. Malaysians did not respond with shock or outrage. They reacted with weary amusement — the kind of knowing laughter reserved for situations that feel both absurd and entirely predictable.
Because in Malaysia today, the phrase “inside job” no longer triggers alarm.
It triggers recognition.
And therein lies the real danger. The issue is not whether this particular incident proves to be internal sabotage or something else entirely. The deeper risk lies in what such suspicions reveal: a political culture where trust is eroding faster than reform can rebuild it.
Once trust disappears within a ruling coalition, governance soon follows.
After all, it is very hard to run a country when everyone at the same table keeps wondering who might quietly be holding the syringe.
Mihar Dias (mihardias@gmail.com) is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!
The User Content (as defined on Newswav Terms of Use) above including the views expressed and media (pictures, videos, citations etc) were submitted & posted by the author. Newswav is solely an aggregation platform that hosts the User Content. If you have any questions about the content, copyright or other issues of the work, please contact creator@newswav.com.
