Forty years is a remarkable achievement. But it is also a double-edged moment. An anniversary can tempt us to look backwards with satisfaction, to polish the silver, admire the laurels and congratulate ourselves on having made it this far. We should certainly celebrate the extraordinary journalism, the debates we started, the investigations and above all the people who have brought The Independent to this point.
But the anniversary is not a resting place. It should be a launching pad. The most fitting way to mark 40 years is not to ask how we survived – but what we are going to do next.
That question goes to the heart of what The Independent has always meant. We were founded on a simple but powerful idea: that journalism should think for itself. Independence is more than a business model or a position on a masthead. It is a state of mind.
It means being prepared to question the consensus, challenge the powerful, resist the fashionable and, when necessary, question ourselves. It means curiosity without conformity, scepticism without cynicism and the confidence to ask whether the accepted wisdom is actually wisdom at all. Forty years on, that principle is not an inheritance to be placed behind glass. It is a responsibility to be renewed.
The world in which we operate, however, has changed beyond recognition. The technology through which people discover, consume and share information has been transformed, and the pace of that transformation is accelerating. Artificial intelligence, data, video, audio, social platforms and forms of storytelling that we have not yet fully imagined will continue to reshape journalism.
We should not approach that future defensively. We should approach it with curiosity. Technology is a tool, not the journalism itself. The enduring advantage of an independent publication will remain judgement: the ability to distinguish signal from noise, to recognise what matters, to ask the question nobody else is asking, to make complexity comprehensible without making it simplistic, and to tell a story with enough force that people stop, think and see something differently.
That is why disruption matters. Disruption is often used as a fashionable synonym for change, but real disruption is more demanding. It means being willing to disturb our own certainties. It means understanding that the habits that once made an organisation successful can eventually become the habits that hold it back.
We should never allow our history to become an instruction manual for our future. Reinvention is not a periodic makeover. It is a survival instinct. If the world changes, we change with it. If readers change, we listen. If technology opens a new door, we should be among the first through it. And if something we have always done no longer serves the reader, we should have the courage to stop doing it.
That purpose has never been more important. We live in an age of extraordinary abundance of information and, at the same time, extraordinary scarcity of attention. Everyone is competing to tell us what to think, what to fear, what to buy and what to believe. The volume of information is immense; the supply of genuine understanding is much smaller. This is where independent journalism has an opportunity to become more valuable, not less.
Journalism does not merely describe the world; at its best, it changes the way people see it. A story can take something obscure and make it visible, take something complicated and make it clear, or take the experience of one person and reveal something universal. The ability to shape a narrative is a form of power, and that power carries responsibility.
We always have the obligation to think about how we express ourselves, and the AI age makes that an exciting challenge. We should use it boldly, but never carelessly. We should have the ambition to make an impact without confusing impact with noise. The strongest journalism does not shout simply to be heard. It earns attention by having something worth saying.
So let us celebrate 40 years. Let us celebrate the journalists who came before us, the readers who have travelled with us and the journalism that has earned its place in the history of this remarkable publication. But let us not confuse remembering with resting. The world ahead will not be won by those who preserve the past most carefully. It will belong to those who understand what was worth preserving and then have the courage to reinvent everything else.
We should never rest on our laurels. The Independent was born to think differently. Forty years on, our ambition should be to think differently about the future itself – to scan the horizon for what is coming, to challenge ourselves before the world challenges us, and to carve narratives with the power to make people look again. We should not wait for the future to arrive and then report on it. We should be curious enough to see it coming, inventive enough to shape it and independent enough to question where it is taking us.
Forty years is not the end of a story. It is an invitation to write the next one. And we intend to write it ourselves.
The Independent’s Free Thinkers: 40 people who have shaped our world
The Independent is turning 40 – and we want you to write for us
I fetched Esther Rantzen’s breakfast. She taught me how to be a TV presenter
The terrifying prospect of president Pete Hegseth
History suggests Britain could go back into the EU without a referendum – here’s how
Nigel Farage is desperate for distraction – so he’s turned on women (again)
