At altitude, England dug so deep. They came out of an absolute battle to seize a quarter-final place against Erling Haaland’s Norway.
An epic game worthy of the Azteca had almost everything, and especially excellence at both ends from Jude Bellingham and Jordan Pickford, as Thomas Tuchel’s side had to give their all.
A flailing, if spirited Mexico were dispatched 3-2, the tension ratcheting up with all of the refereeing decisions and the ghosts of 1986 swirling around.
There were also echoes of 1998 and 2006, after Jarell Quansah had been sent off for a VAR review. That was one of many, to go with multiple moments of doubt.
Get the stories others don’t – become a member of Miguel Delaney: Inside Football
England, for their part, showed an admirable belief through all of that. They instead ensured 2026 is a different story, for now, after a game that was arguably the country’s most dramatic ever World Cup win. It certainly tested emotions, especially amid those last 11 minutes of stoppage time that felt as long England’s 60-year wait.
Sometimes, though, emotion is all these World Cup matches come down to – especially with the way they drive and drag teams to such limits.
We saw it all here, culminating in lamentable Mexican tears. Even Tuchel said he was almost sorry to see them out.
In this last World Cup match at the Azteca, the hosts had put everything in but they were always lacking something.
Thomas Tuchel’s switch to a hugely defensive – and risky – 5-3-1 once Quansah was sent off actually worked much better than expected, as the anticipated Mexican siege never really arrived.
Pickford, after two sensational saves in the first half that weren’t far behind Gordon Banks’s in the same country, met everything in that period. Dan Burn meanwhile quelled the previously imposing threat of Raul Jimenez. He brought the best out of Pickford and, ultimately, the team.
For all the rightful lauding of England’s character and resolve, there were again concerns and flaws, that you can’t help but feel would be punished against superior sides.
Most of all, England saw another game – arguably the third of five – become a dogfight.
They struggle to assert any kind of control, which also feels slightly contradictory, when Elliot Anderson had played so well.
That is probably influenced by the fragility at the back. It is remarkable how quickly gaps appear.
The Quansah red card can even be linked to these issues at right-back.
England were again exposed.
But then… how many sides at this World Cup are actually good enough to not get punished themselves?
Just look at the team arguably the strongest on this side of the draw – even if that is now very arguable – in Argentina. Their test of will against Cabo Verde was even more gruelling than this.
Perhaps that’s just the nature of this World Cup, the gaps lessened, every game a battles.
And if so many other sides are flawed, can they be just as easily punished by England if Harry Kane and Bellingham are on this kind of form?
It’s almost like they’re trading influential games now. Kane gets two in the last 32 then Bellingham gets two here, with the captain adding a brilliant penalty that did end up being decisive.
It was Bellingham that shaped the entire game, though, right up to how his two goals set everything that followed.
One irony to that is England initially looked like they’d got their approach absolutely correct.
Clearly conscious of the excessive demands of this game, Tuchel had England play in a constrained approach where they invited pressure and then patiently hit Mexico on the counter.
With one drive forward, it was like Bellingham changed the entire tone of the match.
He was then there to finish from another counter moments later, plundering the first in brilliant fashion.
That should have been the pattern of the game. Having scored one on the counter, England then scored another on the counter press.
Bellingham was there again.
That should have been that, even as the Mexican fans sang “yes we can”.
It seemed little more than hope, an attempt to manifest some deep will that wasn’t really based on any substance.
And then England just frittered away themselves.
If the foul that led to Julian Quinones’s brilliantly taken goal did not look a foul, it came from a spell where England were giving away a series of free-kicks.
That seemed so needless… especially since it was 2-0.
Again it came back to this issue of control. Allowances obviously can be made for everything about these settings, but this was another one of those dogfights when England had been purring.
They badly needed the break. The game wasn’t letting, until we entered a series of big decisions and VAR reviews.
First there was Quansah, then the crucial reprieve of Raul Rangel’s foul on the relentless Anthony Gordon for Kane to power home – then Kane’s own foul for Jimenez’s penalty.
Amid all of that, though, there was only Mexican crossing.
In one crucial moment just before the end of the 90, they had a chance to work an opening but instead played it back to swing it in again.
England gradually learned to deal with this, despite the emotion – and 11 minutes’ injury time – inevitably bringing one big scare.
And that is maybe the main lesson of this game: England still have a lot of issues, but they have qualities and spirit and an ability to respond that can take them through to the final.
They now just have a big striker to face.
It will be going far to ensure the emotional peaks of this match are reached.
At the end of the game, England sank to the ground in relief.
That was certainly down to more than altitude. They’d gone very, very deep – and it might yet mean going deep into this World Cup.
Read MoreWhy Jarell Quansah was sent off in England’s World Cup clash with Mexico
Americans fear Trump’s red card interference on Balogun could ruin World Cup run
Uefa claims Fifa ‘crossed a red line’ after decision to lift Balogun’s ban
When do yellow cards reset at the World Cup? All the England players on bookings
