.png)
SHAH ALAM - European football's governing body UEFA has threatened to boycott future FIFA competitions if world football's governing body proceeds with plans to allow private investors to acquire stakes in a new commercial entity that would manage its flagship tournaments.
The warning marks a significant escalation in the growing dispute over the future governance of global football.
The threat follows FIFA's announcement earlier this week of plans to establish the FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE), a commercial subsidiary responsible for overseeing major competitions, including the World Cup and Club World Cup.
Under the proposal, private investors would be allowed to acquire minority stakes in the company, with FIFA aiming to raise up to US$4.2 billion (RM17.18 billion) based on a US$20 billion (RM81.8 billion) valuation.
If approved, the initiative would provide each of FIFA's 211 member associations with a one-off payment of US$20 million (RM81.8 million) in early 2027, while increasing funding for the 2027–2030 cycle from US$8 million (RM32.72 million) to US$20 million (RM81.8 million).
However, UEFA has strongly opposed the proposal, arguing that it is incompatible with the long-term interests of football.
“No UEFA national teams will participate in any FIFA competition for so long as these proposals remain alive, unless this proposal has been abandoned in its entirety and binding assurances have been given that FIFA will never again open its governance or competitions to private ownership.
“The World Cup cannot be treated as an investment product. No part of it should ever be surrendered to private investors. The World Cup is not for sale,” UEFA said in a statement.
UEFA president Aleksander Ceferin emphasised that football should never be governed by investors whose primary objective is to maximise financial returns, stressing that such a model has no place in the sport.
He said football’s future must not be dictated by investor expectations, nor should the interests of national associations, leagues, clubs, players and supporters be subordinated to financial returns.
The UEFA president also emphasised that football must not mortgage its future for financial gain.
“Europe’s position is clear. We will never lend this model our legitimacy. No one has the moral authority to sell what they merely hold in trust for the next generation,” he said.
Ceferin also reportedly boycotted the recent World Cup final as a sign of dissatisfaction with FIFA's direction.
FIFA president Gianni Infantino defended the initiative, describing it as an opportunity to significantly increase investment in football worldwide.
He called the proposal a “golden opportunity to turbocharge the development of the game globally”.
The governing body argues that additional commercial investment would strengthen financial support for all 211 member associations while expanding football development programmes.
Resistance to the proposal has extended beyond UEFA, with football confederations and political leaders across several regions raising concerns over governance, transparency and commercialisation.
The Confederation of North, Central America and Caribbean Association Football (CONCACAF) unanimously rejected the proposal during a meeting involving its 41 member associations, including World Cup co-hosts the United States, Mexico and Canada.
“The membership expressed deep concerns about the lack of due process surrounding the proposal, the artificially short deadline imposed and the absence of any review or approval by the relevant FIFA governance bodies,” CONCACAF said
The Asian Football Confederation (AFC) also voiced concern that the proposal had been made public before all 211 FIFA member associations were fully consulted.
Meanwhile, the Confederation of African Football (CAF) has urged its members to carefully review the proposal before making any decision.
In one of its strongest criticisms, UEFA accused FIFA of bypassing meaningful consultation before presenting one of the most significant governance reforms in football history.
“It is both irresponsible and indefensible that a proposal of such significance for football was conceived in secret and brought to the brink of approval without any meaningful consultation with those entrusted with stewarding the game.
“This is not merely a profound failure of leadership but an abdication of FIFA’s duty as the custodian of world football.
“National associations around the world are now presented with an ultimatum – accept the irreversible capture of football’s greatest competitions or bear the consequences.
“This is not a ‘democratic decision’ but governance by intimidation – an act of coercion unworthy of an institution entrusted with the stewardship of the global game,” UEFA said.
Reaffirming its position, UEFA maintained that football’s premier tournament should remain under the stewardship of the game rather than commercial ownership.
The governing body said there are moments when institutions are defined not by what they are willing to accept, but by what they refuse to compromise, adding that this is one of those moments.
“Some things are simply too important to sell. The FIFA World Cup belongs to football. It always will. And so long as Europe has a voice, it will never be for sale,” UEFA said.
